[untitled]
5 comments
maybe dont use "the courier" for your scientific information- https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/covid-1...
The ”experts” use of “transient” just reminds me of when US experts said inflation was “transient” which was incredibly untrue and they no longer say.
Remember that all evidence for everything starts with the anecdotal; and that for how much of the population is vaccinated, suggesting issues have been overlooked is not fun or easy.
Remember that all evidence for everything starts with the anecdotal; and that for how much of the population is vaccinated, suggesting issues have been overlooked is not fun or easy.
"The number of reports logged with medicine watchdogs – from women with side effects – has risen to almost 40,000 in less than a year.
But, despite this, the UK regulator says no link has been established between changes to periods and the vaccines."
But, despite this, the UK regulator says no link has been established between changes to periods and the vaccines."
Well, what determines whether a link is established? When is there enough data to establish a link?
If I’m a public health expert, why not say it must be 400k to be a link? If it ever gets there, why not say 600k?
If I’m a public health expert, why not say it must be 400k to be a link? If it ever gets there, why not say 600k?
In the early months of 2020, all I read and heard on the news was "no evidence", "no or low risk", "highly unlikely", "no supporting data" regarding the health and transmission risk of Covid. The media's role is to calm everyone down and play the government's narrative.
Now I know better. Approach everything with massive skeptism. I wonder what the next facade is being hid when I see a story like this and if we'll ever come to know given the interests that are in charge.
Now I know better. Approach everything with massive skeptism. I wonder what the next facade is being hid when I see a story like this and if we'll ever come to know given the interests that are in charge.
Those who are connected with their intuition have an understanding that not all knowledge comes from numbers and studies.
Removing "knowledge" from "data" is how you get faith and confirmation bias; neither of which have a place in talks about public health.
If you injected 2-3 doses of saline into 50M people (or 25M women), how many would have new changes or typical variability in their body and be uncertain whether they are linked or not?
It’s good to track and chase down anomalous effects, of course. I wouldn’t immediately jump to a conclusion here.
It’s good to track and chase down anomalous effects, of course. I wouldn’t immediately jump to a conclusion here.