SF author and civil-rights activist Joel Rosenberg has been arrested(esr.ibiblio.org)
esr.ibiblio.org
SF author and civil-rights activist Joel Rosenberg has been arrested
http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=2806
4 comments
I'm interested in knowing what really happened, but the popehat primary source is so heavily editorialized it's hard to even read.
There's a news feed about this here: http://news.ellegon.com/
Obviously biased to Joel's side, but there's several different links you can follow on the story from there.
I'm getting in touch with some gun-right lawyers I know to see if they've heard of what's going on here.
Obviously biased to Joel's side, but there's several different links you can follow on the story from there.
I'm getting in touch with some gun-right lawyers I know to see if they've heard of what's going on here.
Thanks. Here's what I've gathered.
Joel brought in a gun, told to take it outside, but not arrested at the time. Times passes, then he's arrested. Conclusion: the arrest is vindictive.
Joel videotaped the encounter, then posted mocking videos. Conclusion: Joel planned on pushing things until somebody did something vindictive.
The arrest may be bogus, but I can't say I'm surprised that someone determined to get arrested was arrested.
As an aside, I like the blog's idea that judges should set bail lower for innocent people.
Joel brought in a gun, told to take it outside, but not arrested at the time. Times passes, then he's arrested. Conclusion: the arrest is vindictive.
Joel videotaped the encounter, then posted mocking videos. Conclusion: Joel planned on pushing things until somebody did something vindictive.
The arrest may be bogus, but I can't say I'm surprised that someone determined to get arrested was arrested.
As an aside, I like the blog's idea that judges should set bail lower for innocent people.
I'm very sensitive regarding personal rights, and given the current information I hope that he's getting out of trouble easily.
On the other hand, please excuse if I have to add the following: For someone living outside the US several parts are just far harder to understand. In addition, the coverage seems to be in general favor of carrying arms/the NRA, which again is hard to understand from the international outside.
Bottom line: If he was just making use of his rights, I fully support the fuss being made. But - it's hard to see the point from this place on our planet.
On the other hand, please excuse if I have to add the following: For someone living outside the US several parts are just far harder to understand. In addition, the coverage seems to be in general favor of carrying arms/the NRA, which again is hard to understand from the international outside.
Bottom line: If he was just making use of his rights, I fully support the fuss being made. But - it's hard to see the point from this place on our planet.
[deleted]
But seriously, I need to bring my gun with me when I go to city hall.