> The young like it because they don't have much skin in the game.
This is completely backwards, they have the MOST skin in the game. They are the ones that are going not going to have things we take/took for granted like: living and working in the EU or being able to enjoy a pension.
If the unreliability of the traditional banking system is due to sanctions, then that would suggest that what you are doing is circumventing sanctions and thus quite likely illegal.
Lots of caveats as I don't have enough information, happy to be corrected though.
Altering the prompt a bit (how will AI put programmers out of work?)
>It is unlikely that AI will completely put programmers out of work. However, it is possible that certain tasks currently performed by programmers, such as routine and repetitive tasks, could be automated by AI in the future. This could potentially lead to job displacement for some programmers. It is also possible that the increasing use of AI could lead to a shift in the types of skills and expertise that are in demand in the job market, potentially making some programming skills and knowledge less valuable. However, as AI and machine learning technology continue to evolve, it is likely that new job opportunities will be created in fields related to these technologies, such as developing and managing AI systems.
Funnily enough I was just asking chatGPT what it thought about it, so here it goes:
>It is unlikely that AI will completely replace programmers. While AI and machine learning technology has advanced significantly in recent years, there are still many tasks that require human creativity and intuition, such as coming up with new ideas, solving complex problems, and making decisions that involve subjective judgement. Additionally, as AI and machine learning technology continues to advance, it is likely that new job opportunities will be created in fields related to these technologies, such as developing and managing AI systems.
I got tired of being asked to sign in for services so I created a google account, reallydontaskmetosignin and I think when I tried to create that username it wouldn't let me, so I shorten it to reallydontask
> Books as a medium actively encourage unnecessary verbosity.
From memory that is the main thesis of this article by Sam Harris (from the article):
>If your book is 600 pages long, you are demanding more of my time than I feel free to give. And if I could accomplish the same change in my view of the world by reading a 60-page version of your argument, why didn’t you just publish a book this length instead?
>And I cannot use this public transport offer. But I am contributing to it with my taxes.
Not all government subsidies, benefits, etc are supposed to help everybody equally, this should not be a hard concept to grasp and yet comments like yours are so common that it makes me think that people don't really understand how taxes and government spending works.
The fact that we struggle massively to recruit people and that there are teams with a majority of contractors would suggest that perhaps there aren't enough people willing to look at the tradeoffs and maybe higher salaries would deliver better value for the tax payer ( we get paid a lot less than contractors)
Obviously anecdotal evidence regarding the above but still
I am a civil servant and while it's technically true that I could double my pay in the private sector, I would likely be on the top 1 percentile or higher.
I'd guess that salary is on the bottom 10 percentile for enterprise architects.
Edit
Pension is a good reason too, it is my main reason :)
Enterprise architect at £50-60k per year seems like a role that has been put on the jobs website to provide evidence that it cannot be filled and thus can go to a service company rather than an honest expectation of getting any realistic candidates
buy cheap, buy twice
Unfortunately, it seems that now it's:
buy expensive, get some shitty cloud enabled feature, still buy twice.