My understanding was that Christopher Alexander called the quality without a name "wholeness" later in their life. Does it mean a different thing than the "resonance" in this article?
I see a lot of people getting confused, and the contention here is not that ChatGPT helped prepare for martial law in any way, but the fact that someone knew about it happening before it happened. Not really related to ChatGPT IMO.
Very interesting... I see a lot of parallel with my higher-ed startup - regulatory moat, fragmented market almost like consulting, and super long sales cycle...
Maybe I should be more mindful of integration cost than I do know.
Any parellogram would work since given four digit number n1n2n3n4, it is divisible by 11 iff n1+n3=n2+n4, and each ni is linear combination of the coords of keypads xi, yi, and thus (n1+n3)/2 = (n2+n4)/2
I also had to do this in my previous work and I took the phonetic embeddings of reference and transcribed text and ran a dynamic time warping with them.
So in the case of N divisible by 3, there are impossible end states. But can you still go ahead and declare that you will sort your library within the possible end states? If so how would one prove that one did not step outside of possible states without showing the cards themselves?
Maybe one could first divide the library into 3 piles and sort within each piles first.
The solution for IMO 2022 is barely a 1/7 solution. It just says ‘ might not satisfy the inequality for all y’ without a proof. That was the point of the question.
I am an idiot for running this in an unsandbox environment as it decided to rm -rf all files to restart from error, deleting a whole lot of important files.
Interestingly I have recently watched a video of Feynmann essentially saying "I cannot explain it to you because you don't have relevant background knowledge" to a question of "What makes magnets repel or pull each other?". Which agrees with the latter.