onlydeadheroes

5 年前議論

I agree completely and I would add that the less mental effort you are spending on your language, the more you are using on your problem. This can have big effects on code and design quality, and allow you to grasp harder problems.

onlydeadheroes

5 年前議論

You are a shining example of your ideology.

onlydeadheroes

5 年前議論

Python started as a language with one correct way to do any task (more or less, but still).

Over time people have added all the other ways and called it progress.

What we need is a python fork that trims most of this crap and makes a faster implementation. And gets rid of this horrifying steering committee or whatever is currently butchering python. No wonder Guido had to leave the scene, to cry himself to sleep probably.

onlydeadheroes

5 年前議論

That is a funny question (in the good sense). I would argue the VCs are cargo culting themselves, but of course another could argue that once the VC money has moved into the pockets of the programmers, then the important part of the process is done.

I just doesn't necessarily create any useful software.

onlydeadheroes

5 年前議論

It will be easier to see who were the useful idiots when the usefulness runs out.

onlydeadheroes

6 年前議論

How did it get dead?

onlydeadheroes

6 年前議論

There is funny business going on at manjaro, but by god do they deliver! I run 5 linux computers at home for various ends and I got tired of putting a new Ubuntu on them every now and then. At the time I looked at manjaro, other rolling distros couldn't even survive an update from the latest installation media to current (sidux). Arch is/was a hobby in itself and the opposite of what I was seeking, but it is an excellent foundation. Manjaro has kept these 5 machines for over 5 years through every possible update and it never broke them. Kernel switching is a joy. Driver installing switching is a joy. This is a very tall order.

That said I do hope endeavouros or others can fill Manjaro's immense boots.

onlydeadheroes

6 年前議論

pure noise? because you are always right, of course.

onlydeadheroes

6 年前議論

I noticed this a few months back, back when someone kept posting anti-meritocracy articles hoping for a thread that wasn't a train wreck. I started testing their algorithms by repeatedly posting the exact same comment and observing what happened. This triggered changes to the algo itself, and eventually it moved from downvoting to flagging, or maybe a human supervisor did. This was across multiple accounts and many weeks of posts. Eventually dang told me to stop. My current account name is a tribute to this.

onlydeadheroes

6 年前議論

Funny how much a single question can be feared.

onlydeadheroes

6 年前議論

What was the state of r/The_Donald at the time?

onlydeadheroes

6 年前議論

Good job making all these accounts to congratulate yourself!

onlydeadheroes

6 年前議論

   Even today the english wikipedia has articles that are full of lies, like for example the Gamergate article.

onlydeadheroes

6 年前議論

  Even today the english wikipedia has articles that are full of lies, like for example the Gamergate article.

onlydeadheroes

6 年前議論

test

onlydeadheroes

6 年前議論

jQuery, when people stop fucking around and start making sites that work again.

onlydeadheroes

6 年前議論

And that is not the only place knowledge gets locked behind:

https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/chinas-devas...

onlydeadheroes

6 年前議論

So shooting the messenger is now a defensible position in polite company?

onlydeadheroes

6 年前議論

He is saying dynamic languages crash and burn in this context. Specifying "dynamic" does strongly suggest non-dynamic languages do not crash and burn in this context.

onlydeadheroes

6 年前議論

Of course, because security issues and language pitfalls have no bearing on cryptographic implementations.

コメント