If hammer companies were suddenly the most valuable international companies, and spent millions on ad campaigns and lobbying about trusting the hammer interface, then you can assume a large amount of people might trust the hammer interface
It is extremely difficult to justify fake beef that costs more than real beef. Maybe for a niche group who care about the ethics of it, but they aren’t enough to support a market. Once fake beef costs 80% or less than real beef, it could get some traction
This is literally what 10xmanagement.com does. They operate as a talent agent, do contract negotiation, handle payment, etc.
The main drawback is they keep a relatively tight roster (to make sure the work is consistent) and they take 25%
The lack of opinion might benefit an LLM. Go is boring and verbose, not much room for cleverness. The code generated by AI or a human will probably be similar
Not sure, but I believe that they were using some proprietary system to account for wind/temp, because over that distance they will have a massive impact. Adjustments via drone likely just means they used a drone to get a better idea of adjustments for follow up shots. I would imagine that the rifle was even held by a device to make more precise micro adjustments
Assuming his rifle was factory accurate to 1/2 MOA and he made zero shooter related inconsistencies, and all environmental factors between the shooter and the target were accounted for, at 4km he would expect to hit inside of a 60cm diameter circle
A more honest approach would be to require a signup before an action takes place. Letting a user do some things, get invested, and then drop a signup requirement on them is a dark pattern
Zero knowledge proofs are basically arbitrary proof of work models. There is some interesting work being done with MPC and ZK proving, so only a small part needs to live on the client. I wonder if this would make it feasible again