Why do you need to have a lot of permissions for the extension?
This extension would be able to read and alter web pages and see your browsing history on this website. This could include sensitive information, including passwords, phone numbers and credit cards.
You can change this later in the Websites section of Safari Settings.
From the very limited screenshots, it looks like the IG team have done a great job with the UX. If they stay true to this and keep it focused, I think this will be the winner.
Focused UX is something I feel has been really lost by many apps coming out today.
The Australian Signals Directorate could be given authority to directly commandeer the IT systems of almost every company in the country that suffers a cyberattack under reforms proposed after the Optus and Medibank hacks (http://www.afr.com/category/slug-20180225-p5bqo6.html).
The proposal for a controversial and dramatic potential expansion in the agency’s “step in” powers comes from an expert group established by Labor after the high-profile hacks last year.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will also announce, at an industry roundtable on Monday, the creation of a federal coordinator for cybersecurity backed by a National Office for Cyber Security within the Home Affairs department.
The move to sharpen bureaucratic management (http://www.afr.com/category/slug-20180225-p5c4q5.html) and the possible expansion in security agency powers in the face of attacks on companies follows frustration within the Labor government (https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/australia-warned-to-bra...) since the damaging attacks.
Home Affairs and Cybersecurity Minister Clare O’Neil in October described current laws as “bloody useless” in dealing with the Optus breach of 9.8 million customers by an anonymous hacker.
She subsequently tapped former Telstra boss Andy Penn (http://www.afr.com/category/slug-20180225-p5c4zl.html), alongside former Air Force chief Mel Hupfeld and head of the Cyber Security Cooperative Research Centre Rachael Falk to come up with potential solutions.
Speaking on Monday as she releases Mr Penn’s discussion paper, Ms O’Neil will say the case for change is clear.
“Australia has a patchwork of policies, laws and frameworks that are not keeping up with the challenges presented by the digital age,” she will say.
“Voluntary measures and poorly executed plans will not get Australia where we need to be to thrive in the contested environment of 2030.”
Expanded definition of critical assets
While security agencies led by the ASD-based Australian Cyber Security Centre already have powers to manage attacks on critical infrastructure such as power stations or energy grids, the discussion paper urges the government to look at shaking up the Security of Critical Infrastructure Act (SOCI), which was passed in 2018 to safeguard key systems.
“This could include adding customer data and ‘systems’ in the definition of critical assets to ensure the power afforded to government under the SOCI Act extend to major data breaches such as those experienced by Medibank and Optus, not just operational disruptions,” authors stated in the discussion paper.
The expansion in the definition could potentially impose reporting obligations on any company that holds customer data as well as expose a wider range of directors to penalties if they fail to demonstrate cyber compliance.
Mr Penn’s discussion paper also calls for consideration of a new national cyber security law aimed at unifying corporate legal obligations and standards between government and industry.
Businesses of all sizes
“Our national resilience, economic success, and security rely on us getting our cyber settings right,” Mr Penn writes in the discussion paper.
“If we are to lift and sustain cyber resilience and security, it must be an integrated whole-of-nation endeavour.
“We need a coordinated and concerted effort by governments, individuals, and businesses of all sizes.
“We believe that the development of a new forward-looking Strategy for Australia is a unique opportunity for us to be ambitious and innovative.
“Any successful strategy must be national in scope, enduring, affordable, achievable, and allow for flexibility to account for changes in the dynamic cyber environment out to 2030.”
The Australian Financial Review reported last week (http://www.afr.com/category/slug-20180225-p5clf5.html) that the cost to companies of expanded national security requirements could reach more than $9 billion combined.
Boards more culpable
Ms O’Neil last week signed off on a risk management protocol that will make board members culpable for failure to properly secure assets, and will cover companies across energy, healthcare, water, food, transport and communications.
“To achieve our vision of being the world’s most cyber secure country by 2030, we need the unified effort of government, industry and the community,” Ms O’Neil will say on Monday.
“Together, we can equip our community to reduce the number and impact of cyber incidents through improved cyber hygiene and provide clear advice on how to respond confidently when they occur.”
Labor’s plan to appoint a coordinator for cyberattacks is aimed at avoiding what happened after last year’s hacks on Optus and Medibank, which triggered a scramble across govern
ment over who was responsible for managing the fallout.
It is understood the new coordinator will be tasked with leading the triaging of action in response to a major cyber incident.
They will also lead cyber policy development, support the hardening of Commonwealth government systems and support Ms O’Neil during major cyber incidents.
Im currently a webflow customer and have had to transition to their new workspace concept.
Overall I understand the concept.
What baffles me is how they are executing the transition.
In the middle of it all, with very poor communication, they are conducting A/B tests on the pricing page at checkout BUT explain that they charge would still be the same as the public pricing.
I dont understand how this is a good A/B test if youre just going to charge the same amount?
From Webflow (quoting the link):
Sefket here from the Webflow Support Team. I hope you’re having a great week so far! :blush:
Thank you so much for your message about different pricing being presented on your project’s Billing tab and Check-out modal compared to what is shown on Webflow’s pricing page.
We are aware of these pricing differences as we are currently conducting an A/B test on the check-out page, meaning that some customers may see alternate prices during check-out compared to what is shown on Webflow’s pricing page.
We sometimes conduct these sorts of tests to help us make informed decisions on how to best serve our community as we plan for the future.
I can assure you that these alternate prices are merely part of the test, and your credit card will be charged according to our current pricing as listed on Webflow’s pricing page :arrow_upper_right: 3.
When check-out is completed, a success screen with the actual amount paid will be shown, and you can also navigate to the Billing tab in your project’s settings to further confirm that you have paid the current price.
For any and all pricing changes, Webflow will always communicate directly to our customers.
We apologize for any confusion caused, and I hope you find this information reassuring.
Please let me know if you have any further questions, and I will be happy to continue the conversation.
I agree that the different VS Studio development on Apple Silicon vs Intel will probably be problematic. Mainly thinking build pipelines and package management.
According to Gartner, companies should adopt the Pace-Layered Application Strategy to build an application portfolio that supports new business ideas and the inevitable business changes.
The Pace-Layered Application Strategy Model from Gartner distinguishes three layers, which are helping organizations improve their applications by categorizing, selecting, managing and educating themselves on those applications. As a result, organizations are finding that it is more efficient, faster and more economical to change, differentiate and innovate, as well as realize returns on their investments.
Having been in several styles of organisations, I'm finding it more than often that organisations (both startups and enterprise), who do not have an understanding and thus a view to implement a pace layered approach find it very difficult to scale efficiently (tech, people, process, market).
Has anyone seen this approach and implemented it successfully to obtain the speed of innovation and market growth it promises?
To maintain BAU of just the exchange, yeah probably dont need many people. The burn is probably attributed towards other R&D projects, acquisitions, CAC, marketing, partnerships etc etc