Also, no "we" in SSI.. only people, Individuals all. "We" is a literary concept that doesn't exist in nature, regardless of legal abstractions, lazy thinking, and data aggregation. I realize EU brains struggle with that.
Ah, EU.. SSI is American concept.. recursive signatory is too, represents data structure "of, by, for" people. Foreign concepts in EU don't quite translate same in that admin context. Regardless EU efforts remain in tact, as Human Rights don't come from database.. thus EU chasing SSI accuracy.
Then you didn't read, and/or don't understand recursive idea.. a process that repeats. CS didn't come into existence until 1950's, so lack of process integrity for digital ID/Data Rights shouldn't be surprising, but structure yields results, not literature. Might want to get out of mass media rags too.. "Sovereign Citizen" is anarchistic, this is about structural integrity of a civil Society using accurate administrative precedence. Functional literacy required.. research "Self-Sovereign Identity" for more..
A recursive signatory deriving root ID Rights + data use under control of people directly fixes this.. a process that repeats is a requirement to prevent second-class process from deriving system outcomes no longer produced "of, by, for" people, Individuals All, as root dependency of accurate governance in a civil Society. Recursive Signatory: https://www.moxytongue.com/2021/07/recursive-signatory.html
This should be considered "on purpose behavior", as Fbook is a cult training system. (Fratnet) People are complicit in using Coupon Book as a dependency for communication with friends & family in this system. These are people who choose to sell themselves out, and sell their contact list out by structural intent. Of course they are going to compromise their accounts, they have compromised themselves and Society by the choice to use this system propagated by digital illiteracy. How is this even surprising or news worthy at this point?
Employees, by structure of tax code, pay Government taxes prior to receiving their own salary. Corporations pay Government for access to labor market in form of tax on employees. People who own their own labor, like much of the innate structure of "Rights" that exist in lieu of Government administration, like 1st, 2nd, etc.. only pay the Government after all expenses have been deducted from revenue, and the self has been paid. This inherent structural shift, between the owner and the owned, is the fundamental source of tension being pulled at by this view of labor market. The Government owns its labor pool. People own root authority over a Government "of, by, for" those people. This is the fault line of civil Society, as presently defined in Constitutional literature. The actual source of American Sovereignty of course, demonstrated by John Hancock and peers, and recursively denied to all that followed, is directly personal. In other words, Amrica, and all Sovereign labor is issued by self-Sovereign authority, or else this dream never exists. Employees opt-out of this inherent structure, and by acting thus, degrade the labor market as defined by this labor Secretary. The Government can't pay for infinite wars and debt without employees paying the Government before their own lives. Structure yields results.. administrative enslavement -to- employment came about, at great human cost fought via war, and owners were victorious on both sides of history.. structure yields results..