>Raising wages has an inflationary effect on the prices in the restaurants/bars
That implies consumers spend differently if they know the actual cost ahead of time, otherwise service inclusive pricing would make no difference. ie the whole industry is exploiting anchoring effects.
Removing anchoring effects would make restaurant businesses less profitable, and consequently the properties that host them less valuable, so lower rents.
There are clear incentives for pushing an inflation narrative.
Last year the UK ATC system crashed when it "encountered an extremely rare set of circumstances presented by a flight plan that included two identically named, but separate waypoint markers outside of UK airspace".
>they'll claim they are "Security related barriers" and therefore exempt?
Why would it be exempt?
The obvious cynical ploy is extending the EULA idea and apple becoming a phone leasing company.
Going from hardware you don't really own, to hardware you really don't own.
Sometimes the full content is available - but only if you navigate to it via a Google results page, and you don't have existing cookies implementing a "free article limit".
Ideas should be judged on their merits, but based on previous behavior I wouldn't necessarily trust Johann Hari's writing out of hand - ie other things in the book.
>The external noise emitted by passenger cars has been controlled since 1929 when the Motor Cars (Excessive Noise) regulations were introduced. New cars are now required to meet Europe-wide noise limits. These have been progressively reduced from 82 decibels (dB (A)) in 1978 to the current limit of 72 dB (A) established in 2016.
How about finding a word that actually captures your meaning, or defining a new one?
I asked an LLM - it came back with "overexertion".
>Using this definition, it’s clear that the appropriate amount of [overexertion] for any activity is zero.