I work far more from home on average. When I worked from the office I had so many interruptions. We’d also take Wednesday and Friday afternoons to play table-top games. There was table tennis and foosball. Sometimes we’d all go out for lunch and it’d take 60-90 minutes. Now I just eat lunch at my computer, I don’t table top game or socialize. I just code and zoom all day.
The abuse is real, but since I’m not commuting it’s a great trade off of an hour wasted each way.
As a manager, it seems true to me. It's much easier to convince HR to pay $X for a new employee than to give a current employee a large enough raise to hit $X.
> This fails to realize Congress works entirely the way it was designed.
Don't really think so.
The 1929 Permanent Apportionment Act subverted the intentions of the founders and clearly swayed the power balance back towards rural areas, even though they have equal representation in the senate.
You can track it separately, but if you use a database like DynamoDB using a ULID as the SK leads to optimized access patterns. If you use a UUID as your SK, then sort order of two items created at the same second is not guaranteed.
Funnily enough the paper you are citing has that quote but they cite another paper. The paper they cite says “It has been suggested that perhaps as little as 8% of dental care is justified…” and cites two more papers.
How is this acceptable in academic research? Nobody is citing the primary source and everybody is citing interpretations of some source that I can’t find the text of (probably because I’m on mobile).
tl;dr your citation is worthless through no fault of your own.