Don't fall for the trap. The question isn't how we should technically force age verification on anybody. The question is why they're pushing it onto everyone. I did not consent to this, neither did you.
Apple was generating (something)@icloud.com whenever you used that service.
Now, it will use (something)@private.icloud.com instead. So you can ban this subdomain instantly, knowing people will be "hiding" with this service by default.
It's like blocking anondaddy, simplelogin etc but not protonmail.
You are questioning the method when people just see the need.
If you're an engineer, no matter what you say about the method, you know a country at war will make you lose all your savings. Or if you're a foreign citizen in a country that will seize your assets, even "by accident".
They lost thousands of emails and they treated every customer individually while blocking people from complaining on their subreddit.
Then, it was posted here on HN and they finally decided to stand up and fix their reputation by saying they care and want to do better, after months of silencing the issue as much as possible.
What if I need cron in my docker container? And ssh? And a text editor? And a monitoring agent? :P
Thankfully LXD is here to serve this need: very lightweight containers for systems, where your app runs in a complete ecosystem, but very light on the ram usage.
When you have torsocks or torify for everything, you're gonna leave your footprint through tor, whereas something like Tor Browser is designed specifically not to leave any print on the web.
Using tor directly on the kernel level means that your DNS is gonna leak. Your OS telemetry is gonna leak etc.
It's still a good idea but it should be implemented top to bottom and nothing left in between, otherwise you're de-anonymized quickly.
"Telegram, another privacy-focused application, is completely invulnerable to this attack"
"Discord […] citing this as a Cloudflare issue other consumers are also vulnerable to"
"Cloudflare ended up completing patching the bug"
I wish Signal would react differently. I still remember the bubble color controversy when they changed their mind after the backlash and not before. :-)
I'm non american too. They make this news look sad, while him and their companies let thousands of people dying at the hospital because they don't have the means to pay for their surgeries.
They have blood on their hands and americans can't have empathy for these people having the power to let someone live or not.
The salary for the CEO of Mozilla is 6.9 million USD (almost 7 million). They fired developers to save money, and put all the money saved into the CEO's salary. I don't see Mozilla getting better anytime soon.
It was already inclusive, through these means, yes. This is the real "écriture inclusive".
I've seen your other contributions on this post and I think I'm done exchanging with you. You nitpicked just the right thing and forgot all about the rest of my comment. Have a nice day, you need some love.
"Mesdames et Messieurs" is inclusive. You've heard that for as long as you can remember.
"Statut : marié(e)" is also inclusive. Check your tax return.
The median "." for example "marié.e" is also inclusive and is probably what you're against. Please hate it right, we all use inclusive, even in English (ladies and gentlemen for example). Being inclusive is good, you're doing it too.
Basically, in the french ANSES article, they say we should be careful with what we're giving to our children, stop food complements, and use medicines instead.
If I come to your house, destroy your door, steal your mom's dinner for 4 ppl, are we both cheating?
How about we compare with something actually worth comparing for? For example switching channels when there's the ad break, or turning the sound off, etc.
When I download something, I'm not "stealing it". When I block an ad, I'm not stealing either. I didn't remove 10$ from Google's bank account that was there before.
Yes, thank you for your comment. Altcoins are terrible, NFTs are terrible, it was all a trend and I'm glad it's gone now. Bitcoin is different, always has been, always will be. Bitcoin is the digital gold. In my opinion it's not a currency and will not function like a currency but rather like gold. You don't buy your latte with gold, but you own gold stocks. Same thing with Bitcoin.
It's the safest, oldest, most tested blockchain out there. You can't beat that.