This is great, thorough, and taught me a lot about Rust and not just it's Strings.
One nit is to explain what the hell the lightning bolts mean in your code samples. I interpreted it as the assertions failed and got really mixed up when reading half way down the page.
Actually, I'm still confused, and on mobile.
> The potentially surprising thing here is that the resulting string is "WÖRLD", instead of "WöRLD".
> ...
> Since we cannot change which memory location the slice spans, ..., we can generally not perform this operation.
These seem to conflict. Maybe a typo. Maybe it's me. Maybe it's maybelline.
Benn trying this out instead of open code with Z.ai and it was dead simple to start. I've had a generally positive experience so far. It feels like a power-user edition of a TUI agent, yet to get up and running didn't require any tweaks beyond setting a model to use.
From what I've been able to research on the good faith exception, it's not in the Constitution but the Supreme Court first outlined this exception in the landmark 1984 case United States v. Leon .
There is a difference between one or even twenty pictures being taken of you, and hundreds or thousands of pictures. One is "public privacy" and the other is "dragnet stalking".
An individual setting up a network of 200-400 cameras throughout a city would not be lega because of property usage I would assume. Not necessarily because of the recording. A llone person doing this would definitely raise more eyebrows.
* System and root directories cannot be selected.
* Can only being activated after user action.
* Requires https.
* Double-confirmation for write access.
No API like this could ever be bulletproof, but it's a start I guess.
Very cool API though, and it really does open up a whole new world of possibilities.
First time I've heard about this. I'll have to look into the security model around it. I'm curious what safeguards are in place to prevent click jacking. I know showing a file picker """should""" be enough of a warning to users to be careful, but it's not hard to imagine a world where a couple of fish accidentally bite the bait of an allow-button, or because they followed instructions they incorrectly trusted.
> I want to say upfront - we've never pursued these invoices
So those people who would feel guilty not paying are punished and those who prefer to try to cheat the system by skipping payment on invoices are systematically rewarded?
This is pretty much exactly my gripes, too. Data centers are necessary, but why are we doing this all the wrong way?
The new Utah data center is building new gas pipelines to generate 9GW instead of requiring ANY percentage of green energy, while also giving massive tax breaks that the families living nearby and statewide will have to cover.
For actionable information on this specific project, see: