Half-truths can and slightly inaccurate statements can be construed as either hard-TRUE or hard-FALSE.
On the opposite side of the political spectrum, "nuance" in political discussion is an accepted reality.
Gatekeeping is acknowledged as a problem - we know those who position themselves as arbiters of truth are not beyond scrutiny.
It would be contradictory to know these are true but also believe conservatives are deluded in believing that fact-checking is fraught with bias.
>Indeed, conservatives have long claimed that fact-checking was riddled with anti-conservative bias and even conflicts of interest (as when PolitiFact, one of Facebook’s six United States-based fact-checkers, shot down a critique of a Clinton Foundation initiative without disclosing that one of that program’s principal funders was a major donor to PolitiFact’s parent organization, the Poynter Institute).
In the mid-2000s I once tried installing Windows XP to a 16GB eMMC drive that was in a PCI slot adapter on my main PC. It did install successfully, just as it would on a normal hard drive. It did boot. The only problem (besides it being only 16GB) is it took forever. The PCI slot transfer speeds were slow. The eMMC card itself was slow. I can't recommend doing it, but it does work.
I love the concept, and would use it daily if there were features for adding/removing/viewing favorites. This is something that the official API doesn't support, so it's not something I'm faulting this application for. Impressive for sure.
Also +1 on wlqlwlql's dark-mode idea, although a color theme in general might be a better approach (but perhaps overly complicated?).
> mosh: Mosh is a popular alternative to ET. While mosh provides the same core funtionality as ET, it does not support native scrolling nor tmux control mode (tmux -CC).
I had no idea Mosh did not support tmux control mode. I was hoping to eventually use Mosh more, but not any more.
Glad to see Eternal Terminal works with FreeBSD too.
Half-truths can and slightly inaccurate statements can be construed as either hard-TRUE or hard-FALSE.
On the opposite side of the political spectrum, "nuance" in political discussion is an accepted reality.
Gatekeeping is acknowledged as a problem - we know those who position themselves as arbiters of truth are not beyond scrutiny.
It would be contradictory to know these are true but also believe conservatives are deluded in believing that fact-checking is fraught with bias.
>Indeed, conservatives have long claimed that fact-checking was riddled with anti-conservative bias and even conflicts of interest (as when PolitiFact, one of Facebook’s six United States-based fact-checkers, shot down a critique of a Clinton Foundation initiative without disclosing that one of that program’s principal funders was a major donor to PolitiFact’s parent organization, the Poynter Institute).
https://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/media/310849-who-will...