ekc·7 年前·議論You might find this paper interesting for a counter perspective. http://joelvelasco.net/teaching/3334/block99-how_heritabilit...The person is biased and dismissing is a good option.
ekc·7 年前·議論> Most people probably realize it. What we need is for the American CEOs, financial elite, members of government that have investments in China...The person you were originally replying to's comment.
ekc·7 年前·議論The goal is to force every other company to do it as well, protecting the long-term prospects of Uber. A smart thing, and possibly a good one in the short term.
ekc·7 年前·議論A company being filled with stupid people is not the same as a license being anti-commercial.
ekc·7 年前·議論The GPL is no less commercially friendly than the MIT, given it allows commercial usage, and explicitly protects commercial usage.
ekc·7 年前·議論The GPL is a commercial-friendly license, and in fact, that's one of the freedoms it explicitly protects.
ekc·7 年前·議論No. You're either misinformed or intentionally lying.https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/aug/16/an-eye-for-an-...https://www.reuters.com/news/picture/medic-shot-in-eye-durin...
ekc·7 年前·議論If you had read the thread before commenting, you'd find that the developer of this used to work at Canonical, which lends them at least some credit.
ekc·7 年前·議論This is interesting, given Automattic has one of the...weirdest views on free speech there is today.Near-absolute free speech, within the means of the law, with really odd exceptions.
The person is biased and dismissing is a good option.