from what i see people want to boast about using it as it makes them seem like early AI adopters, and they find random use cases for the product, rather than the other way round
why should ars technica have to publish grovelling apologies to satisfy their readers. it's not a tabloid.
and as it's obviously a HR issue both parties are restricted to what they can say, if they want to provide more details on their personal feeds and people are interested they can find out respectively.
we've done projectd with kinect sensors for fall prevention in hospitals. one con is that many people are uneasy if there's a camera-looking sensor pointing at their bed.
the fact that it can be easily modified OTA is a red flag enough that Tesla is pushing software out without the same level of testing hardware does. shipping a MVP in the hopes it doesn't' cause an accident isn't exactly best practice.
there are many more beneficial bacteria in the environment than disease causing ones. wiping them all out may decrease some disease incidence but prob cause more issues like allergy/eczema etc.
it's hard for new gamers to get into a new game when developers are following the marvel universe concept where everything needs to have a backstory and you need to watch prequels/sequels to fully enjoy things. ultimately they are pandering only to their die-hard fans who will churn with time
i think one of the problem is the value of commercial properties is directly linked to their rent. hence why so many would rather keep their property empty than negotiate down the rent as it would instantly devalue their property. they'd rather stay in their inflated bubble.
using the term neurodiversity/neurodivergent is a bit redundant and a fad.
why are people so surprised that non-robots are thinking differently? everyone are individuals and no two brains are the same. it sets the expectation that being homogenous is the standard and is the norm.