To be happy, you must define something as a source of happiness. Smart people might be more nuanced or finnicky about actually making such a determination.
It would be similar to governance for crypto's. Take the lessons of the open source community, apply them too legal code. Take the successes up crypto governances, and apply them to political seats. I can tell your frustration and skepticism means it must be a good idea! I feel quite good about putting seats in high offices in the hands of those who own the most of a digital token.
"But underneath that is profound loneliness – the kind only a genius in a world full of idiots could possibly understand."
Are you mind-reading loneliness into Scott(he has never said he's lonely)?
Btw the edgy cartoons are the funny ones. Are we not allowed to talk about the new vectors people take advantage of in the new system? That in and of itself seems like a vector(create a problem people aren't allowed to talk about).
Frustration is an emotion which seems to be ever increasing against a monolith that is the internet, where your voice doesn't feel like it matters, because you can't see the reaction of anyone.
I still think it's funny that the ruby on rails creator didn't have enough experience for a job in ruby on rails in a jobpost that required a temporally impossible number of years experience.
This should fall under a reasonable right to privacy. They should need to get a warrant for a specific crime to search for specific plates, not blanket access to search all and contrive crimes stridently after the fact.