This doesn't make sense. I think you mean "If you are really good at something, you'll find AI might not be as good as the something you are really good at"
Ask it to take control of a browser using something like Playwright and use the UI itself like an end user would and evaluate whether it is a good experience.
It's very problematic for companies, mainly because of the tooling. Large companies are equating lovable, replit, bold, V0 with Claude Code, Codex, etc all under the "Vibe Coding" banner.
I try to fit the former under the banner of "Prompt-to-app Tools" and the latter as "Autonomous AI Engineering"
Agreed. If your identity is your ability to bang away on a keyboard writing instructions to a computer in Python (or any other "language"), you're in for a bad time.
If your identity is solving difficult, domain-specific software-based problems, efficiently and securely, it doesn't matter if your instructions are written in English, French or... Python.
Is that a "yes" on lint rules? AI needs determinism to block commits because once the slop hits code review, it's already a gigantic waste of time. AI needs self-correcting loops.
78% of Republicans is actually pretty dreadful. I would expect that number to be closer to the mid 90s for a party's former president. Can you imagine what the numbers would be for Obama?