An user asked me "You know this will cause more emigration right?" How is an affirmative answer supposed to be flamebait or unsubstantive? I would definitely love to hear those arguments.
>Cameras are only really relevant in Europe. We don't really have these in the US. I do get the cops angle - google maps doesn't really do this.
Well yeah, in Europe we don't have cops on the roads. In the US you don't have cameras, but have cops everywhere. You still want Waze in either case, probably more so for the cops.
>PRICE OF THE MODEL IN THE VIDEO: 185.269 EUR
This has to be including local taxes, which in some EU countries can double the price of a car.
>- re: waze - huh? Google Maps is just fine. The differences are such a personal preference that they are moot.
Waze tells you where cameras and cops are, Google Maps usually does not.
>- The touch controls on Carplay are not great. Try pinching and zooming on Google Maps in Carplay and its awful. (note - I do think Tesla misses the boat on having more physical controls as they almost rely entirely on touch...which is unsafe and not great)
I don't think I've ever needed to do this, it always automatically positions the map correctly.
>Looks awesome, but that appears to be on a €185k ICE car.
Pretty sure the pricing starts at €94,540. They also have an EV at around the same price, but it's an all-around worse car.
Tesla is far behind everyone else on navigation due to the simple fact that Teslas do not have Carplay. There's no Waze on Teslas, how can you drive without it?
But here's how the current Mercedes navigation looks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCgy3askMcM The AR stuff works really well and is arguably way ahead of anything Tesla offers.
It's not really surprising, the 3 big German automakers spent around 3 billion USD to buy (at least at the time) the best mapping product on the market.
Nobody cares about who you are. You are nothing but an extremely sad irrelevant person that considers being on irc for 29 years some sort of an achievement.
This is how you end up doxed, hacked, SWATed and with fake blogs created in your name advocating legalisation of pedophilia and whatnot.
It's better to just not. If you spend any amount of time running IRC networks you will soon discover that there are plenty of people who see this as a game, you're probably not up to play.
>EU-based governments are at least honest about their intent of spying on their citizens, where the collection & processing of said data is at least subject to due process and can potentially be challenged in court.
Not really. It can be challenged in court in that anything can be challenged in court. There's no real due process.
How could it not be? More labour for the rest of us. Economically the benefits of immigration are unquestionable, despite scaremongering by the Western right.
How can the bank curtail such behaviour? Is the logic that Epstein should have been entirely denied access to banking services?
> Why on earth wouldn't you want the bank to be held partially responsible?
Because the idea that criminals shouldn't be allowed access to banking services is fucking vile. Anyone seriously suggesting this genuinely deserves to be burnt on a stake. Not allowing convicted criminals to vote is bad, but this is infinitely worse.
What next? Shall we require sex offenders to wear special armbands and allow casual violence against them as they try to navigate society?
I thought that this was the comment we are discussing:
>> You know this will cause more emigration right?
>So? That's awesome!
How is that "arguably flamebait"? It's just an enthusiastically affirmatory response to an yes/no question.