"smart" in terms of navigating society and understanding where value is. What things are worth learning vs not learning, what kinds of skills are worth taking risks for etc. "smart" in terms of just having a degree and believing that being credentialed = intelligence is completely orthogonal to the point I intended.
A stupid person will fall for get rich quick schemes. A stupid person will believe grinding it out at a job they hate will eventually lead to something better. A stupid person will lack the will to try hard enough to better themselves.
Well yeah, animals that can't hunt or fend for themselves are killed by predators or starve to death. Humans are animals. If I have a family, I will care for my kin before strangers who don't know any better or are too stupid to help themselves. At a certain scale, helping hopeless people starts to harm society.
This is true regardless of your political persuasion. Republicans point to never ending handouts and democrats point to "deplorables". Both are disgusting, however it's ironic what those in the west consider "suffering" in one of the most wealthy nations on earth. Laziness and self pity will kill a man faster than simply being disadvantaged.
Regulate universities to reduce what they can charge for education. Federally kill teachers unions that have caused rot in public education. Do NOT forgive student loan debt as more than 50% of the debt is held by "high net worth" [0] individuals and graduate degree seekers [1]. Bailing out student loan debt without regulating what colleges can charge will only make current issues in education worse.
Smart people command more value than dumb people - it's a sad but true reality. Educate your kids!
My biggest hurdle as a mostly back end engineer with a shaky but workable knowledge of react is creating a page that doesn't entirely break moving from desktop to mobile. Like most things today, there are hundreds of "valid" ways to do this with each JS tutorial / dev seeming to have their own preferences that are seemingly completely arbitrary to me.
Excited to learn more about this! Dig the design for his page as well - wish I could hire a designer / dev hybrid for $300-400 to make a single page site like this! (inquiries welcome)
If Biden follows the playbook he had with Barack goodness knows he'll give the boys in blue and black whatever they want when it comes to surveillance of private citizens.
I never had a drinking problem, but quitting alcohol altogether has resulted in nothing but positive outcomes.
It's curious how my friends from college are largely in two groups now (not correlated to intelligence or motivation);
A) not really that interested in alcohol and focussed on work
B) focused on work but drink every night and still "party" all the time
This is seemingly an American phenomenon that's incredibly regressive and also seems to negatively affect women more than men. For whatever reason, women also seem more susceptible to the trap of drinking and partying excessively.
Very interesting to see how they bailed on using an IHS over the two dram modules ON the processor die! I love how you can see "reach" engineering solutions in apple products, it's clear that they realized the ram would be too large to fit under an IHS and just decided to go with what ended up in the M1 Mac Mini. Very much hoping apple starts allowing even third party nvidia drivers again for latest gen GPU's...
Wow, OneItemStore is awesome. Any chance there's a way to peak at the source? I'm just starting to dip my toes in front-end anything and simple projects like OneItemStore still seem quite daunting.
It's not hard - work in the office will always be paid more than remote work because communication in the office requires less inertia and is more efficient.
I wouldn't be surprised if JaneStreet open sources an internal tool soon-ish. They've actually been writing a number of custom plugins and modules for WireShark to support internal custom protocols and seem to have a lot of features they'd like that aren't currently present in WireShark.
Articles like this are almost infuriating, in most cases it's lazy journalism highlighting a problem or grievance from an angle or statistic some journalist finds "interesting" without giving any thought to a reasonable solution.
The only solutions I've seen are "everyone should travel less" basically making the proposition that poor people don't deserve air travel or making grandiose claims about building huge high speed rail networks. The rail networks bit is ironic since building them wouldn't solve any energy production or distribution carbon emissions and would likely just take money that should be spent on research into promising renewable sources.
I do however love dogs owned by responsible dog owners (since I don't live with them) and think dogs / pets in many cases are amazingly loving companions!
Much like human children, dogs who have responsible and mindful owners are amazing. I'm honestly kind of sad I'm allergic because it seems like it would be incredibly fulfilling to have a well trained and obedient furry companion.
I dislike pets because I'm incredibly allergic to both cats and dogs. My current roommate got a "therapy dog" for her narcolepsy against my will (after I explicitly told her I'm incredibly allergic) and to be frank I now have no clue why you'd want a pet. It's hair is everywhere, the apartment smells like a dirty sock now and well this morning hair even ended up in my breakfast.
The front of the luxury building in NYC I live in is also basically always covered in urine from the pets of lazy dog owners.
Low key, I prefer to be the only class of animal in my home. Pets are unsanitary (I'm not a clean freak, but a dirty animal living in the same space as me is disgusting).
Obviously this information isn't directly relevant to the article, however I think it's interesting to see how much ecological damage domesticated pets have. Cats in terms of decimating bird and rodent populations and dogs, well they kill whatever they want and in the worst cases will attack toddlers etc. Pit Bulls should be banned, they aren't "loving" or "just friendly". Candidly, if I were back in a state with legal carry and saw a large dog running at me I wouldn't hesitate to shoot it on the spot.
First they take money and allow far right groups to advertise on Facebook now they oppress people of color by making Oculus hardware for racially inferior whites.
Thanks for adding some more civil discourse to this discussion :) .
You are correct in your assertion that I am in a relationship (we share the same apt) in regards to "dating" a sex worker. I added this context to indicate that I have more first hand knowledge of what it means to be a sex worker than someone who well... doesn't date an online sex worker.
My girlfriend has mentioned that some women do not handle the money well or make emotional compromises with work hours etc that can at times lead to very sad outcomes. It would be a sad day if it was socially "okay" to ask any random woman if they "have an onlyfans" so you can see them naked for $8. That is a sad state of affairs, granted we're already half way there since asking if a woman has an Instagram in many cases could be perceived as asking "do you have an instagram filled with soft-core pornography of yourself?".
I'm open to objection by any of the members of HN who likely (ironically) identify as male feminists. For the record, my gf finds your cause hilarious and pandering at best ;)
This is incredibly concerning as only twitter or inherently biased "fact checking" services will likely control the definition of what is or is not "misinformation".
This is the big-tech equivalent of saying "we might be joking or being cheeky when we ban someone" just to add more legal ambiguity and grey areas when it comes to explaining why they banned / flagged something or let something be allowed.
A stupid person will fall for get rich quick schemes. A stupid person will believe grinding it out at a job they hate will eventually lead to something better. A stupid person will lack the will to try hard enough to better themselves.