Something similar has been happening to me with Ghostty, but there is no error message or link and it only happens when Claude uses it's interactive questions interface.
It becomes completely unresponsive to any input except scrolling. I can't select options or even cancel out.
I'm no longer in corporate America, so maybe I'm out of touch a bit, but could you just...not...use an LLM? You can still solve interesting problems on your own if you choose to do so?
Also building voice agents and have found GPT 5.4 with no thinking to be the sweet spot for latency vs intelligence vs cost.
GPT 5.5 with no reasoning is actually slightly faster, and much smarter, but too expensive.
What I'm really looking forward to are the next gen speech to speech models. gpt-realtime-2 is almost there, but not quite good enough for our use case. 5.4 actually beats it on answer latency even cascaded with stt/tts.
You static typed evangelists have lost your damn minds. You seem to have completely misunderstood what this library even is because you have some primal urge to boast static typing at every chance.
You can build high quality software with dynamically typed languages, and Ruby is an absolute dream to read and write.
We use and love RubyLLM! A wonderful and easy to use framework.
Agreed with another commenter on the frustration with the responses API not being naively supported; that seems like a huge miss. There is a connector from another dev, but it's buggy and not as high quality as the main gem.
Really looking forward to future development and especially 2.0!
Edit: Just saw that responses API is now native? I will definitely check that out.
I think something the article glazes over is that all these AI search results, whether it's Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, or whatever, are mostly synthesizing and summarizing existing search results from classic search algorithms.
If the results the LLMs are grounded in haven't changed, then LLMs haven't changed SEO much.
...except, of course, stealing clicks from the actual creators.
Exactly. Not Starlink, but Tesla, their stupid non AI allocation tracker said my model X would be ready in a month for about 13 straight months (Early Model X plaid allocation)
I think you are wildly underestimating how much of a hard on people have for calling businesses, even when there are better and faster options clearly available, like clicking a button online.
Staffing our phone lines is the absolute bane of my small (non tech) business.
Exactly! Many Ferraris of the past have gotten single digit MPG, no one cares. All of a sudden they have to make a Chinese looking EV because of "efficiency"? Give me a break.