> So downing a bucket or two of chicken wings felt good to the last wing? I doubt it
Well there's your problem. You're failing to believe and listen to the people who actually experience the problem, and insist that it simply can't be true.
I would overeat because the pleasure signals never stopped.
But sure, over 40% of Americans are obese and it's a personal moral failing, not something systemic.
> Again some discipline would go a long way rather than a pill
I lost about 40lb 10 years ago through diet and exercise. I did intense exercises at least 3x a week, and watched what I ate strictly.
Guess what: it all came back and then some, because I was white knuckling my way through life, and it was unsustainable.
You know nothing about my level of discipline, so you ought not comment on it.
> Let's see where all this medication puts this generation down the road
Agreed, but teachers can't be expected to be the only ones providing this help.
Other public institutions outside the school system need to be in place to support the parents who are stressed and overworked and barely have time to parent.
And their right to be helped stops at the line where they're causing harm to the learning of others.
Discipline in schools isn't and cannot be about holistically reforming the problem kids, it's about making sure those who want to learn can.
You can't dump the entirety of systemic poverty, racism, mental health, etc. on the education system and expect it to work well.
It's also in large part profit motive. You can bet there are corporations licking their chips at the thought of opening cut-rate schools and raking in the profits. They can also incorporate all sorts of corporate propaganda that their parent companies want them to inject.
The profit motive belongs far far away from education.
This is absolutely a huge factor, if not the biggest factor in education: kids who are actively disruptive and harmful to the learning of others being kept in with other kids, draining all of the attention from the teacher.
The causes and solutions are not as simple as "these kids are bad, kick them out of school", but any solution needs to involve kids who aren't disruptive and WANT to learn getting an environment conducive to that.
People can most certainly believe in a collective moral code that is, at times, at odds with the laws of their country, and simultaneously not dictated by a central religious authority.
Desiring the state to more closely model one's personal moral code isn't a signifier that people are placing the state at the "moral center", it's an indicator that they want those with a monopoly on violence to act in accord with what they believe is right.
I do believe the collective moral codes are drifting from those dictated by religions, but I hardly think that is a bad thing, given the rigidity and absolutism of many religions.
> Why do you need to have a constant "perception" of government outside of election day?
Because you leave yourself more susceptible to recency bias, and the prevailing media narrative on election day rather than continually evaluating the actions politicians take in real-time with proper context, evaluating the raw facts for yourself.
Suggesting lifestyle change as a cure for obesity presupposes that obese people simply lack the knowledge of what must be done.
The real struggle is in the doing.
Many tout "listen to your body" as a solution, or "think about how junk food makes you feel" as one of the go-to solutions in "lifestyle change".
For the first time in my life I was able to adhere to this advice, because I'm on semaglutide.
My body now actually is telling me that too much junk food feels bad.
Before now, it actually felt VERY VERY GOOD to eat nearly unlimited junk food.
There is something going on in my body that prevents the proper signaling of "too much food feels bad", and this medicine corrects that for me and countless others.
There's an argument to be made that this is a constructive dismissal, and would thus qualify for any benefits that a termination would entail, but I'm sure that type of legal wrangling is not what the people at Schwab will want to deal with.
If it were me, I would simply continue working from home until my access and/or paycheck were cut off.
The smartphone had multiple killer apps: web browsing, maps when you needed them most instead of having to print MapQuest directions, and device consolidation (iPod, cell phone, GPS, and web browser all in one!)
The touch interface elegantly solved the problem of not having a full keyboard and mouse.
The ultimate vision for these headsets is not yet realized: to unintrusively overlay enriched visual information over our surroundings. This doesn't hit the unintrusively piece by a longshot, nor are the apps that realize this vision even announced.
Vision Pro does, however, provide a first step platform to develop those apps when the tech does shrink to an everyday wearer.
What I don't understand is how anyone who has read the Dobbs decision sees it as even handed and reasonable.
Ignoring stare decisis with the flimsy "history and tradition" argument is farcical, considering the jurisprudence it was overturning was in place for about 1/5 of the nation's history.
The legitimacy of the court is in question because the court is at this point another political branch .
This is because the legislature is going full scorched earth in their "advise and consent" powers as a weapon.
There certainly are, I'm just pointing out that much of the software that is charging a subscription is doing so to more closely structure their revenue to their expenditures.
Continually running a service with its own recurring costs with additional improvements (SaaS) justifies a subscription, because your product is constantly improving, and constantly incurring costs.
A one-time car purchase costs the car company some capex upfront. They actually incur more cost running whatever DRM servers lock these motors down to prop up this extortionary business model.
or, crazy thought, pass the cost savings of not having to manage multiple trimlines onto the consumer instead of trying to make a quick buck by artificially borking the motor.
Well there's your problem. You're failing to believe and listen to the people who actually experience the problem, and insist that it simply can't be true.
I would overeat because the pleasure signals never stopped.
But sure, over 40% of Americans are obese and it's a personal moral failing, not something systemic.
> Again some discipline would go a long way rather than a pill
I lost about 40lb 10 years ago through diet and exercise. I did intense exercises at least 3x a week, and watched what I ate strictly.
Guess what: it all came back and then some, because I was white knuckling my way through life, and it was unsustainable.
You know nothing about my level of discipline, so you ought not comment on it.
> Let's see where all this medication puts this generation down the road
My bet is longer and healthier lives.