I try to keep up with the industry, just to see where it's going. From what I can tell, AI (in the general sense) is so flexible it can be applied to just about anything with observable data points, which is basically everything. Are these applications useful? I think right now they are impactful, not necessarily useful. EG: we can already copy someone's voice perfectly with just a small amount of audio using AI. But in practise, not much has come from this incredibly remarkable feat.
So what does AI need to get to the next level? Not much but time to mature, all the tools are already there.
Rising costs of housing is, almost entirely, due to the fact that individuals are allowed to own more houses than they can use, while most people don't own any. It seems fairly obvious that if you control the housing market, a human need, you can set prices as high as they will possibly pay them.
I'm sure there's a better reason, but I honestly think a major factor for why people think this stuff is important is because Conway called it 'the game of life', and it was a pretty early discovery in computer science. It was basically a recipe for sci-fi imagination and headlines, leading some people to believe this is literally a program about generating cellular life.
I guess all business/project/hobby websites should shut down then? Your website won't get very far at all when most people rely on google's search results, browser, and email service.
It is a modest trial of a four day work week. You are so far from disaster. This can only be a good thing, if it doesn't work they stop doing it, but probably it will work because people are more productive when they have time to breath.
There has not been a gross over-usage of the word exploit in the past 10 years. See google trends, the word's usage is trending downward. Its peak was actually around 2005.
I admire resume liars. The job market isn't fair and you should do anything you can to get ahead. (Employers are going to pull tricks like this, so why not? Just be smart about it)
It is hard to make anything significant without that sort of background though. If your business actually is software, and not just a physical business built on top of software, it's hard to see how you're going to make much money by just gluing canned functions together. Either your own ignorance will do you in, or you'll have to hire someone who actually does understand computer science.
I just... don't understand the science behind this. Have you actually seen how sausage is made? It is just pureed meat with salt and spices. There is no difference between that and a raw steak, from a health perspective. This tells me most of our knowledge of what is an unhealthy food is just based off of some from-the-heart intuition.
It is still a buzzword, because there are still too many possible scenarios even when taking out the 'plastic packaging = processing' part. Using salt to preserve vegetables is processing the same way using sorbic acid to preserve cheese is processing. You have to be specific.
Which one of these is unhealthy? Eh, doesn't matter, it's processed therefore it's bad.
"Processed" is just a buzzword. Any food put into a package can be considered 'processed'. There are thousands of chemicals used in food processing for different purposes. Are they all bad for you? Because that is what the statement suggests.
It's not very helpful in finding out why people are actually unhealthy