Here's the Most Idiotic and Brilliant App Ever(thevine.com.au)
thevine.com.au
Here's the Most Idiotic and Brilliant App Ever
http://www.thevine.com.au/life/tech/the-single-most-reckless-idiotic-wonderful-app-ever-is-here/
38 コメント
For all those sad iPhone users out there who really want to break their phone, I threw together http://jsfiddle.net/2Kxzv/2/show/. The interface is primitive, and all it tells you is the time that the phone was in the air (and possibly not even that, if the phone spins at all).
My high score is 604, and I think I want to stop playing this game.
My high score is 604, and I think I want to stop playing this game.
So a friend of mine interned at this small company nearly 3 years ago, and made this app over his summer: http://iphonehangtime.com
On my mobile device so couldn't really look through the comments to see if someone already mentioned hang time, but I'll just leave it here.
Randall Munroe published some relevant calculations recently on the ability of humans to throw things high:
http://what-if.xkcd.com/44/
Summary: a professional baseball pitcher might be able to reach fifty metres but the human arm is optimised for throwing horizontally.
http://what-if.xkcd.com/44/
Summary: a professional baseball pitcher might be able to reach fifty metres but the human arm is optimised for throwing horizontally.
I wonder how this app works: Obviously it must transmit the highscore quickly enough before the phone shatters. I hope it opens and warms up a connection before you throw it. Maybe it can constantly transmit the height and falling time/speed up until the last second of life of the phone
If you don't catch it, you don't get points. Sucks, but that's the rules!!
If the app is indeed able to have a fairly accurate height value, it just needs the turning point height in order to calculate speed, duration of fall, and the (more or lees) exact time of impact. So it could transmit the value whenever it detects that the phone has stopped moving upwards.
You're not going to get the turning point from accelerometer data, as the phone is in free fall the whole time. The non-zero acceleration will be on takeoff & landing (or launch & catch, or impact...).
How does this app make money? And why is it getting so much attention now even though the same idea's been done before?
Might actually be a good benchmarking app for makers of rugged phones
As someone who compulsively throws things in the air when bored, this sounds amazing.
I'm curious why this was banned from iTunes. Does anyone know if this is against a specific rule, or if it was a subjective decision?
2.1 Apps that crash will be rejected
8-)
Actually,
13. Damage to device
13.1 Apps that encourage users to use an Apple Device in a way that may cause damage to the device will be rejected
Actually,
13. Damage to device
13.1 Apps that encourage users to use an Apple Device in a way that may cause damage to the device will be rejected
Cool, thanks.
It really bothers me that Apple banned an app like this. Just allow people to be idiotic. There's even a disclaimer after all...
As for the app itself, cool! I'm glad somebody had the audacity to ship something as outrageous as this. I don't think it will get much of a following, but I suppose if you really don't care about your phone or you're really confident in catching this could be a cool, reckless waste of 10 minutes.
EDIT: For clarification, I don't really side with or against Apple in general on things, so this isn't meant to be a "Apple's always a walled garden, BAH" post, etc...I just really feel any company should let users feel free to destroy hardware. But I understand that might not be the best philosophy to run a multinational company.
EDIT2: Just thought of a way to game this after reading another comment - slap on a Lifeproof case, go in a big pool shallow enough to stand, throw it really high. Eliminates the need to catch it (within...reason...).
As for the app itself, cool! I'm glad somebody had the audacity to ship something as outrageous as this. I don't think it will get much of a following, but I suppose if you really don't care about your phone or you're really confident in catching this could be a cool, reckless waste of 10 minutes.
EDIT: For clarification, I don't really side with or against Apple in general on things, so this isn't meant to be a "Apple's always a walled garden, BAH" post, etc...I just really feel any company should let users feel free to destroy hardware. But I understand that might not be the best philosophy to run a multinational company.
EDIT2: Just thought of a way to game this after reading another comment - slap on a Lifeproof case, go in a big pool shallow enough to stand, throw it really high. Eliminates the need to catch it (within...reason...).
They sell phone warranties for damaged phones so it's a fairly direct conflict of interest.
Also "13.1 Apps that encourage users to use an Apple Device in a way that may cause damage to the device will be rejected"
Also "13.1 Apps that encourage users to use an Apple Device in a way that may cause damage to the device will be rejected"
Perhaps I didn't explain myself - I'm not saying the rule isn't transparent, I understand very well there's an actual rule. My complaint is that it's there at all.
Although, what you said about warranties makes sense...however honestly that hasn't kept friends of mine from deliberately breaking their phones just to get new ones.
Although, what you said about warranties makes sense...however honestly that hasn't kept friends of mine from deliberately breaking their phones just to get new ones.
...then your friends are dishonest, and their dishonesty raises the price I have to pay when I buy a product from Apple.
Did you criticize them when you found out they did that?
Did you criticize them when you found out they did that?
Sure. Not that it helped any. Interestingly, it's more my "untechnical" friends - exclusively those, actually. The technical ones are somewhat invested in technology news and wouldn't do that because they understand a lot more of the process. On the other hand, those that are dishonest in this way, in my experience, know nothing about the tech of Apple except that it's, well, new and shiny.
As for myself, my iPhone 4 is half-broken and I'm still eeking out whatever life I can get from it before I get the iPhone 6 in the Fall.
As for myself, my iPhone 4 is half-broken and I'm still eeking out whatever life I can get from it before I get the iPhone 6 in the Fall.
Perhaps it is worth more to Apple that a user can download apps and continue the "iPhone lifestyle" than worry about how to fix their device. I personally think that it is not a conflict of interest.
Apple should ban this app. The amount of support it is going to eat up not to mention the headlines the tech press is going to write are not worth it. Selling an app that is basically designed to break the phone is just a really bad idea.
Bad idea, perhaps. But why should Apple get to determine what is or isn't a bad idea for one to do with their own phone? (Although I would suspect part of the reason they banned it is to avoid claims of "Apple's so greedy that while they ban so many legitimately useful apps they allowed this one, just because it can break phones resulting in added profits for them from people buying replacement phones".)
Because, Apple is warranty liable for selling an app that basically get you to break your phone either via current replacement plans or the expected lawsuit. This is a money loser and a problem for parents.
Apple rejected the app. Did you read the article?
Yes, I read the article and knew they banned the app before leaving my comment. I agree with their position and further added why. Should is often used as an agreement with an already taken position.
[deleted]
Maybe because Apple might need to fix the phones? Or their carriers insurance providers would?
When friends ask which smartphone to get, I often recommend the iPhone, despite being a long time Android user and fan.
The reason is that Apple has a very generous straight replacement policy (at a fraction of the retail new price) even if you don't subscribe to any of their care plans. This is a world different from makers like HTC and Samsung who fully intend to double dip if you have an issue with your device, where a replacement of a broken device costs 100% of its original price (meaning you are paying again for marketing, R&D, profit, markup, etc). I have faced exactly this twice (both with Samsung), once where they claimed nebulous, unproven corrosion damage on a device that had never touched water, and had all clear water sensors. As a user there is nothing I can do to contest this, their warranty being effectively useless through no negligence of mine. They nicely offered to fix it for just over a thousand dollars.
Samsung and HTC and others want you to bust your device. Apple doesn't, because they have a stake in it as well, making no profit from your own misadventure.
The reason is that Apple has a very generous straight replacement policy (at a fraction of the retail new price) even if you don't subscribe to any of their care plans. This is a world different from makers like HTC and Samsung who fully intend to double dip if you have an issue with your device, where a replacement of a broken device costs 100% of its original price (meaning you are paying again for marketing, R&D, profit, markup, etc). I have faced exactly this twice (both with Samsung), once where they claimed nebulous, unproven corrosion damage on a device that had never touched water, and had all clear water sensors. As a user there is nothing I can do to contest this, their warranty being effectively useless through no negligence of mine. They nicely offered to fix it for just over a thousand dollars.
Samsung and HTC and others want you to bust your device. Apple doesn't, because they have a stake in it as well, making no profit from your own misadventure.
My other half dropped her phone recently and was utterly distraught. Neither of us realised just how insanely favourable the like for like replacement deal was, and were unsurprisingly hugely complimentary about Apple afterwards.
I cannot overstate how helpful and efficient the staff were and the process was just so quick and simple. If (mildly idiotic) apps like this being banned are the price of that piece of mind? I pay it gladly.
I cannot overstate how helpful and efficient the staff were and the process was just so quick and simple. If (mildly idiotic) apps like this being banned are the price of that piece of mind? I pay it gladly.
Agreed. The screen my girlfriends iPad broke edge to edge, so I decided to bite the bullet and go pay to have it replaced. Took it to the Apple store, he looks at it for a second and runs into the back. Hands me a new one(refurb?) and (after verifying that I backed up already) says "You're all set! Have a good day". I was pleasantly surprised, and looked like an awesome boyfriend.
I know someone who broke an iPad the day after buying it and the Apple store people refused to do anything for free.
Won't take long until someone takes that thing skydiving to get the world record. :-)
[deleted]
I would assume that it measures against upward motion as well, but I could be wrong.
I hope they have a standing connection to the server during the throw and detect ... disconnects. That way, they could detect crashes and give approximate credit for the height.
I don't want to throw my phone high into the air, watch it go to pieces and not even get a high score.
I don't want to throw my phone high into the air, watch it go to pieces and not even get a high score.
>"I don't want to throw my phone high into the air, watch it go to pieces and not even get a high score."
I'd think that would defeat the purpose of the "...and catch it!" step.
If anything, I'd want such an app to record video or perhaps fire the camera for a still the peak. I'm thinking that would a be huge plus to the idiotic entertainment potential, like a less inane Vine and a slight deterrent from the inevitable result spoofing.
I'd think that would defeat the purpose of the "...and catch it!" step.
If anything, I'd want such an app to record video or perhaps fire the camera for a still the peak. I'm thinking that would a be huge plus to the idiotic entertainment potential, like a less inane Vine and a slight deterrent from the inevitable result spoofing.
I agree with your idea of the camera firing...but you think this could be less inane than Vine...?
There is a camera design that uses exactly this method, unfortunately patented:
http://www.slashgear.com/squinto-throwable-ball-camera-grant...
Prior art, unfortunately also attempting a patent is at:
http://jonaspfeil.de/ballcamera
http://www.slashgear.com/squinto-throwable-ball-camera-grant...
Prior art, unfortunately also attempting a patent is at:
http://jonaspfeil.de/ballcamera
Unless your phone includes "a substantially spherical housing suitable for being projected into an airborne trajectory", I think you're in the clear.
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=H...
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=H...
[deleted]
Plus they would be able to keep a total count of destroyed phones, which would be quite interesting. "This app has destroyed ??? phones."
A cute error message would be appropriate afterwards for comic relief, when you accessed it on your computer, etc.
"Your phone soared 100 ft. before dying a soldier's death. New high score! Good luck about the phone though."
"Your phone soared 100 ft. before dying a soldier's death. New high score! Good luck about the phone though."
they should multiply the height with the current market price for the phone you used. so you have to keep throwing to stay in the charts as your model devalues.
Also, a multiplier for the case you describe.
Also, a multiplier for the case you describe.
No way! This is the price is right rule. Go over and you lose it all!
Heh - Great idea, but can you imagine testing that during development?
[deleted]
Been done: http://maemo.org/packages/view/n900fly/
Actually, Sergey Brin made the same app and showed it at the Android G1 launch :)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWwLZfVpCyU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWwLZfVpCyU
Came here to post this as well.
In the end, he decided it might be irresponsible to leave the app on the market and encourage people to throw around their shiny new expensive phones.
In the end, he decided it might be irresponsible to leave the app on the market and encourage people to throw around their shiny new expensive phones.
I am quite surprised this isn't at the top.
Pah. That's nothing. I have an app idea called 'iSkip', where you skim your phone over the water and your phone sends back how many hops it did as it's last act.
Don't fool people, there is no such thing, but there is something cooler called "the skipping movement". A real skipping app would be much more brilliant:
http://iskip.com/
Turn the app on, wrap the phone in bubblewrap/foam.. Clean,Safe,Fun
Well, looking at the "World top 10" high scores (on app), the top one has a record of 43.16m. I cannot imagine why someone would threw a cellphone to this far.
I wonder if there is a way to "hack" the accelerometer...
I wonder if there is a way to "hack" the accelerometer...
In addition to "why someone would throw a phone that far"... that height of 43 m is impressive, since it (neglecting any force except gravity) requires an object to be thrown vertically at around 29 m/s to stay in the air for almost 9 seconds. 29 m/s is over 104 km/h... but throwing things upwards is not that easy.
That top score should be the result of manipulating the sensors or the data sent to the server. [edit: ... or measuring some other action than throwing the phone]
That top score should be the result of manipulating the sensors or the data sent to the server. [edit: ... or measuring some other action than throwing the phone]
You could fairly easily throw and catch it while in the vomit comet (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduced_gravity_aircraft). That should get you in the 25s range. Next up would be using it while in the IIS.
If the software is not too picky detecting weightlessness, just holding your phone while inside a fast elevator going down could also work.
If the software is not too picky detecting weightlessness, just holding your phone while inside a fast elevator going down could also work.
It would be in air for 6 seconds.
2 * (29/9.8) ~= 6s
It's probably easier to hack the protocol it speaks with the server. That's what ruined the world-wide stats in the iOS game center too.
Drop it from a great height? It's probably just measuring the flight time, by measuring the time for which the accelerometer reads zero. Infinite points if you can get your phone into orbit!
I'm not so much concerned with the why, but more... how? 43m straight up is a pretty tall throw, I'm picturing water balloon slingshots or something...
"I wonder if there is a way to "hack" the accelerometer..."
A fun, if elementary, physics puzzle.
A fun, if elementary, physics puzzle.
Perhaps they were on a rollercoaster or one of those rides that you take vertically straight up?
Idiotic because you might destroy your phone?
Or idiotic because the energy spent on this could have been used to build something that actually provided value?
Or idiotic because the energy spent on this could have been used to build something that actually provided value?
I'd argue that entertainment, no matter how small, is value to someone.
Did you see Pacific Rim?
Yes.
People are playing crazier/riskier games everyday! I mean why not ...
The current high score is 43.16m - I wonder if somebody found a way to cheat, or if they really really do not care about the wellbeing of their smartphone.
Put it in an egg drop style container that will protect it from a large impact, the drop it off a building our launch it from a trebuchet.
Not that hard. Lifeproof case, throw it from a pool of water, watch it land in the pool of water.
Step one: find a tall building.
I don't endorse this.
Alternatively: skydiving!
I don't endorse this.
Alternatively: skydiving!
I was wondering how fast someone would hook this up to a rocket and see if it can actually record a few thousand feet.
Look at this app:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.nichtlustig...
It shows comics from the German nichtlustig.de
In the appstore you can see some screenshots, also of the included 4 panel instructions: It visualizes the 4 operations to be done with the app: forward/backward, mark as favourite, random cartoon and destruction.
When I saw it I laughed for a long time :-)
When I saw it I laughed for a long time :-)
Wow, amazing! I wish I had thought of this.
Think of it as the heart of a 2-part high-school physics project:
1. Develop a rocket that will carry your smartphone as its payload.
2. Develop a case that will allow your smartphone to survive the landing.
...and a 2-part college project:
3. Find investors for your high school project, then market it.
4. Profit!
Think of it as the heart of a 2-part high-school physics project:
1. Develop a rocket that will carry your smartphone as its payload.
2. Develop a case that will allow your smartphone to survive the landing.
...and a 2-part college project:
3. Find investors for your high school project, then market it.
4. Profit!
Ok, the app's web service is rather prone to manipulation:
You just need to HTTP GET the following URL:
* NICK is what you entered for the highscore
* HEIGHT is the float value of the height in meters, i.e. "1.23"
In the HTTP response, you get a data structure (not sure which encoding it is, but it is straightforward) of the highscore data:
You just need to HTTP GET the following URL:
http://www.carrotpop.com/smth/php/save_result.php?id=<UID>&nickname=<NICK>&country=&result=<HEIGHT>&latitude=0&longitude=0
* NICK is what you entered for the highscore
* HEIGHT is the float value of the height in meters, i.e. "1.23"
In the HTTP response, you get a data structure (not sure which encoding it is, but it is straightforward) of the highscore data:
[[["1.","LIATO","44.19m"],["2.","ROYBOY_91","43.16m"],["3.","YAIR40","35.12m"],["4.","GABRIEL","34.70m"],["5.","KAI","31.10m"],["6.","KAFAC99","21.06m"],["7.","JOSH","20.37m"],["8.","KEANSKI","17.61m"],["9.","EKREM6363","16.10m"],["10.","LORENZO","12.24m"],["2047.","MY BEST TRY","0.71m"],], ...
How exactly do you prevent something like this? How do you ensure that the stats sent over the internet are coming from an actual approved client?
My instinct tells me the simplest solution would be security by obscurity - adding some validation token that the client generates by some obscure and hard to reverse engineer manner. Is there any better way to 'validate' your client?
My instinct tells me the simplest solution would be security by obscurity - adding some validation token that the client generates by some obscure and hard to reverse engineer manner. Is there any better way to 'validate' your client?
I had to deal with this before. Basically we combined several obscuring techniques:
Use SSL for the requests which makes it harder to sniff the API.
Add some sort of tamper token like you suggest.
Use a specific User Agent string and check for that.
Provide no error messages if any of the above fails.
Use SSL for the requests which makes it harder to sniff the API.
Add some sort of tamper token like you suggest.
Use a specific User Agent string and check for that.
Provide no error messages if any of the above fails.
> Use SSL for the requests which makes it harder to sniff the API.
Won't help - it's trivial to setup a proxy to MITM the traffic.
> Use a specific User Agent string and check for that.
Won't help - it's easy to manipulate a User-Agent. Assuming you're manually creating the GET request (via cURL or other means), then it's only one more option to bypass this.
> Provide no error messages if any of the above fails.
Will make debugging a pain. Also, if I'm an attacker, I'm going to try and clone the request as best as I can the first time, then see what I can get away with.
> Add some sort of tamper token like you suggest.
This is the best option. Not quite sure the best way to implement it, but perhaps some sort of CAPTCHA (this would be a pain), or some kind of random request id, etc. might work.
Won't help - it's trivial to setup a proxy to MITM the traffic.
> Use a specific User Agent string and check for that.
Won't help - it's easy to manipulate a User-Agent. Assuming you're manually creating the GET request (via cURL or other means), then it's only one more option to bypass this.
> Provide no error messages if any of the above fails.
Will make debugging a pain. Also, if I'm an attacker, I'm going to try and clone the request as best as I can the first time, then see what I can get away with.
> Add some sort of tamper token like you suggest.
This is the best option. Not quite sure the best way to implement it, but perhaps some sort of CAPTCHA (this would be a pain), or some kind of random request id, etc. might work.
I would add to that: use a self-signed cert for the SSL. If you rely on the OS's PKI its relatively easy for an attacker to add their own CA and read the connection.
Can I ask how you discovered the URL the app was making requests to?
Set up a proxy setup pointed to a squid or whatnot that logs request. Use tcpdump on the router. If you have a rooted Android device you can use tcpdump there, or instrument the HTTP framework code to log requests, or...
But assuming you have control of your home network and aren't just using a Linksys thing out of the box, just logging into the router and watching traffic is by far the most straightforward.
But assuming you have control of your home network and aren't just using a Linksys thing out of the box, just logging into the router and watching traffic is by far the most straightforward.
Decompile the apk with one of a number of tools (apktool, baksmali). Least that would be what I would do.
Fiddler on your desktop machine - http://fiddler2.com/documentation/Configure-Fiddler/Tasks/Co...
This app should sell a kit with a parachute...This would be the new Toy Parachute Men.
It requires GPS. Crashes on my tablet.
Also, see their Facebook. They publicly post GPS location of winners, together with StreetView. Is that stated in the app? It can be a privacy concern.
Also, see their Facebook. They publicly post GPS location of winners, together with StreetView. Is that stated in the app? It can be a privacy concern.
com.carrotpop.www.smth E/AndroidRuntime: FATAL EXCEPTION: main
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: requested provider gps doesn't exisit
at android.os.Parcel.readException(Parcel.java:1429)
at android.os.Parcel.readException(Parcel.java:1379)
at android.location.ILocationManager$Stub$Proxy.requestLocationUpdates(ILocationManager.java:646)
at android.location.LocationManager._requestLocationUpdates(LocationManager.java:660)
at android.location.LocationManager.requestLocationUpdates(LocationManager.java:482)
at com.ansca.corona.CoronaSensorManager$1.run(CoronaSensorManager.java:163)
at android.os.Handler.handleCallback(Handler.java:615)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage(Handler.java:92)
at android.os.Looper.loop(Looper.java:137)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main(ActivityThread.java:4745)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invokeNative(Native Method)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:511)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run(ZygoteInit.java:786)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main(ZygoteInit.java:553)
at dalvik.system.NativeStart.main(Native Method)They are assuming all Android devices have GPS. Is it common for tablets to have GPS?
btw, I see com.ansca.corona.CoronaSensorManager in the exception stack trace, suggesting this app was written in Lua using Ansca Corona.
btw, I see com.ansca.corona.CoronaSensorManager in the exception stack trace, suggesting this app was written in Lua using Ansca Corona.
man, you've tried it with tablet! How big your tablet is? I think they should appropriately rescale scores for the weight and aerodynamics of the object being thrown.
>the weight and aerodynamics of the object being thrown
Somehow I doubt that's included in the Android API. ;)
Somehow I doubt that's included in the Android API. ;)
aerodynamic is calculatable from deceleration which is sum of gravitational "g" plus aerodynamic "Cx" multiplied by square proportional to the speed. The weight is known for a given model of device.
>The weight is known for a given model of device.
By "known", I assume you mean "known, assuming you want to track down (an trust!) the specs of the ~4,000 different Android devices", correct?
By "known", I assume you mean "known, assuming you want to track down (an trust!) the specs of the ~4,000 different Android devices", correct?
I remember a piece of advice for taking original photos is to set the timer then throw it in the air. I would love to try it but no one will let me borrow their camera.
This guy is building a throwable panoramic camera, looks pretty cool:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BYSSKNS5Ks
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BYSSKNS5Ks
use a gopro. this is exactly the sort of silliness they're made for.
I wonder how smart "throw" detection is. Could I strap it to a two-stage model rocket with a couple of D class motors? Or are you limited to a single impulse event, in which case I've got a couple unfired air bags kicking around.
There's a phone recycling bin here at school; I'm tempted to grab a few old android phones and see if I can get one working well enough to try it out.
There's a phone recycling bin here at school; I'm tempted to grab a few old android phones and see if I can get one working well enough to try it out.
My take on this, not:
- on GPS, as mattbessey suggested. (precision: 2m max)
- integrating accelerometer data : Very difficult, as the telephone would spin. Also: measurement errors are integrated too, so not too precise.
Best option is time based:
1) Detect launch/landing time by looking at accelerometer spikes (easy, good time precision)
2) Altitude = 1/2 * g * ((timeLanding - timeLaunch) / 2) ^ 2. Air resistance negligible. g = 9.81 m/s^2.
- on GPS, as mattbessey suggested. (precision: 2m max)
- integrating accelerometer data : Very difficult, as the telephone would spin. Also: measurement errors are integrated too, so not too precise.
Best option is time based:
1) Detect launch/landing time by looking at accelerometer spikes (easy, good time precision)
2) Altitude = 1/2 * g * ((timeLanding - timeLaunch) / 2) ^ 2. Air resistance negligible. g = 9.81 m/s^2.
Nope, because phones don't have altitude detection. The only thing it can go by is accelerometer data, and you can infer what that data should look like using high school physics. They probably measure the duration of "weightlessness" (freefall), and maybe also check that there are large enough spikes of acceleration at beginning and end, although those will be mostly outside the range of the accelerometer. You can probably fool it by throwing it from some high point (bridge, building) and have someone catch it at the bottom.
There's a company in Austin called Mutual Mobile that got its start in 2009 with a similar app called Hangtime: http://www.texastechpulse.com/interview_with_john_arrow,_mut... They're now 300+ people and build mobile apps for enterprise clients.
So...CarrotPop is off to a good start I guess.
So...CarrotPop is off to a good start I guess.
Is the Galaxy Tab version available? That could get dangerous.
A simpler and safer version of this would be something where you spin your phone and catch it right-side-up. Scoring could be done by counting the number of times this was done successfully in a row without catching it the wrong way or dropping it, or double-triple spins etc. I do this for fun all the time. So far, no drops on concrete.
The Kinect has an accelerometer (to help it sense tilt, and find the floor normal).
I wanted a gaming achievement: "30 seconds in free fall". With a follow-up five minutes. The first one you might get using the Vomit Comet. The second probably requires significantly more expenditure.
I wanted a gaming achievement: "30 seconds in free fall". With a follow-up five minutes. The first one you might get using the Vomit Comet. The second probably requires significantly more expenditure.
It should stream data via a socket realtime to a server somewhere. Then when your phone breaks, at least you get a new record.
Business idea!
Put together a baseball with an accelerometer, a small digital display and maybe bluetooth as well.
Sell it to schools and individual athletes as a training device. You pitch and it tells you what the speed of the last pitch was. Connect it up to a computer and it will give you a graph of the velocity over time, allow you to track improvements in pitching and track users.
Or does such a thing already exist?
Put together a baseball with an accelerometer, a small digital display and maybe bluetooth as well.
Sell it to schools and individual athletes as a training device. You pitch and it tells you what the speed of the last pitch was. Connect it up to a computer and it will give you a graph of the velocity over time, allow you to track improvements in pitching and track users.
Or does such a thing already exist?
Been around for years. I remember playing with one as a kid. The ones I've used haven't been too accurate or consistent, however. Amazon reviews indicate that not much has changed.
I remember playing with those in the early 80s. We'd try to get the highest number by smashing them off of brick walls.
http://www.amazon.com/Speed-Sensor-Baseball-MPH-Markwort/dp/...
9" Speed Sensor Baseball (MPH) from Markwort
For the iOS crowd: here is a similar game my friends and I built at a Hackathon last week with Node and Socket.io that you can play from mobile Safari: http://phonesma.sh/
Visit it on your browser to get started, then on your iPhone to play (App is not tuned for Android accelerometer data yet).
Visit it on your browser to get started, then on your iPhone to play (App is not tuned for Android accelerometer data yet).
I remember working on a similar, though slightly less destructive, app. I had a first or second generation iPod touch and it's back was curved so that you could spin it on a flat surface. I collected lots of accelerometer data and wrote the algorithm to figure out how long and fast the device had been spinning. Unfortunately, the next generation of devices came out with a flat back so I shelved the idea.
How about an app which awards points based on g-force while driving a car? You could get bonuses for complete flips, 'hard stops' etc.
I've been playing the awesome DropPhone app since 2012! https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.ungulation...
I imagine the strong horizontal acceleration and in-flight rotation of the phone may "throw off" (heh) the height calculation, but it likely would have earned an impressive score.