> do you think that there has probably been no progress in climate sciences during the last 30 years and thus predictive power is at the same level?
I agree there will have been lots of progress. However, 30 years from now people will probably say that the same thing to excuse todays predictions if they were wrong.
How do we distinguish between: "VCs are are selected because they go to school X", "school X is good at creating VCs", and "school X receives more potential VCs"?
My guess is probably more statements 2 and 3 for the usual suspects eg Stanford
I exclusively use Firefox on Android because of the addons. For me it's the killer feature. Dark mode, ad blocks, YouTube while screen is off. It's made android so much more enjoyable.
>I lost it when at my previous job I found a 20 multiline super complex type defined by another dev, asked him to describe it because I was in a tight deadline and had not time to parse whatever he was defining. He starts with "it's pretty simple" and then used like 10 minutes to describe me what he meant while writing on paper the various pieces getting confused two time
I find that NodeJS runs eventually out of memory and crashes with applications that do a large amount of data processing over a long time with little breaks even if there are no memory leaks.
Edit: I've found this consistently building multiple data processing applications over multiple years and multiple companies
This is great! I've been using Firefly III for years. However it consumes a good chunk of time to keep up to date at a line item resolution with many cards and accounts across countries as I've not automated any of it.
I agree there will have been lots of progress. However, 30 years from now people will probably say that the same thing to excuse todays predictions if they were wrong.