Most of those using well-known privacy tools for "privacy" do not realize that they are painting a target on themselves. The elite hide data in plain sight. I am not elite, btw. I stay the hell out of it, and I suggest you do the same if you don't know what you are really doing, or even if you do.
God will bring every deed into judgment, including every secret thing, whether good or evil.
> I could certainly imagine people objecting to having the speech presented in a secular school.
Yes, and the price is both loss of freedom and loss of history. We've also lost books that aren't PC.
> Finally and probably most importantly, what do speeches really teach us?
Communication skills (Intonation, volume, speed, timing). Listening/attention skills (I doubt we have high school students anymore with the attention span to listen to the whole speech- I don't even have it because I'm too ADHD and brain fried). Sympathy (How can you listen and not feel it). History (Self evident, gives details and story to bland summarized facts). Need more?
> Privacy is a relic of the past, so we’re going to push people to open up their lives and share, connecting them together.
Privacy is not a relic of the past, but a lot more that you intend to be private is and/or could be made public.
Information is like an infectious agent. Even if you want to keep it to yourself, if you are around others, it will likely spread, though you can control it to some extent. Even when you think it is eradicated, it may still be lurking, like smallpox and polio, to come back with force later. If you live in a cave in a large forest alone, the chance of it spreading is much lower. If you live close to others in a village, there is still a chance of infection. Few really want to live totally alone, so infection is almost impossible to avoid. But, no one can stop you from moving to the forest, or at least wearing a surgical mask.
God will bring every deed into judgment, including every secret thing, whether good or evil.