WHO Chief Doubles Down on Free Speech Crackdown
reclaimthenet.org5 pointsby wallbrownf0 comments
The richest 1 per cent (77 million people) were responsible for 16 per cent of global consumption emissions in 2019 —more than all car and road transport emissions. The richest 10 per cent accounted for half (50 per cent) of emissions.
It would take about 1,500 years for someone in the bottom 99 per cent to produce as much carbon as the richest billionaires do in a year.
Since the 1990s, the richest 1 per cent have burned through more than twice as much carbon as the bottom half of humanity.
The carbon emissions of the richest 1 per cent are set to be 22 times greater than the level compatible with the 1.5°C goal of the Paris Agreement in 2030. By contrast, the emissions of the poorest half of the global population are set to remain at one-fifth of the 1.5°C compatible level.
Every year, the emissions of the richest 1 per cent cancel out the carbon savings coming from nearly one million wind turbines.
The death toll from floods is seven times higher in the most unequal countries compared to more equal ones... Climate change adaptation
Climate change mitigation
Climate finance
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
Paris Agreement
UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
Additional details Zagema, Bertram
Kowalzig, Jan
Walsh, Lyndsay
Hattle, Andrew
Roy, Christopher
Dejgaard, Hans Peter
Publisher(s) Oxfam International
DOI
10.21201/2023.621500
How to cite this resource Political advertisers will have to disclose when they use AI or other digital techniques to create or alter a political or social issue ad. Meta unveiled this policy earlier in the month, with Clegg reiterating that this will be a requirement, with effective penalties if political advertisers fail to do so.
Meta will block new political, electoral and social issue ads during the final week of the U.S. election campaign. Meta implemented this rule in 2020, in order to stop campaigns from making claims that may be uncontestable, given the time frame. This is critical in relation to the first point, because while Meta does have penalties for deepfakes, a campaign may be willing to risk such, if it could help to seed doubt about an opponent, particularly in the final days leading into a poll.
Meta will continue to combat hate speech and Coordinated Inauthentic Behavior, which has been a key focus for its moderation teams. Meta will continue to remove the worst examples, while also labeling updates from state-controlled media, to ensure more transparency in political messaging.
Clegg has also underlined Meta’s expanding, and unmatched moderation effort, which has been increased significantly over time, especially around political influence and interference. BREAKING: MintPress News & @AlanRMacLeod has been banned from PayPal for unspecified reasons.
Help us fight back against this onslaught of censorship: https://t.co/dzLbAlo48o https://t.co/7CkUbXPFQy
— MintPress News (@MintPressNews) April 28, 2022
MintPress News happens to have published critical journalism about PayPal itself in the past, like the articles it published in 2018 by Whitney Webb documenting the way shady PayPal-linked billionaires Peter Thiel and Pierre Omidyar have advanced the interests of the US empire and facilitated imperial narrative control, or this one from 2016 on how the company blocks Palestinians from opening accounts while showing no such bias against illegal Israeli settlers.