Are you trying to justify innocent human experiments by saying nature is doing it anyway ? Nature is a mad scientist, unfair and horrible so let's be like it ?
Maybe if you were seriously ill because of a genetic experiment we did on you (and that you did not need) as you were an embryo, then you would not hold the same view.
I don't think you get where the morality problem is... It's not about being Amish that say "we shouldn't temper with God's perfect creation".
It's about a country doing human experimentation on innocent people that do not need it, it's not to cure them from an heridetary problem but to breed a stronger race. China will only show the success of their experiments and will hide from the eyes of the world all the failures, handicapped babies, secondary effects of their human experiments. They'll make experiments on babies with lots of failure (it's science, you never get it right at the first experiment) and once in a while they'll put a video on YouTube like they just did saying "Aw look how healthy they are". But behind there going to be a lot of guinea pig children with serious secondary effects. And the worth part is how they'll make sure the rest of the world never see those "failed" children. This might be Nazi-level stuff that's going to happen and this is what people with a glimpse of ethics left are concerned about, it's not about "not tempering with God's perfect creation"
We are taking the Chinese route for surveillance, data, AI. It's going to be the same for genetics. Maybe even faster because people don't want to be spied on but want to have stronger/resistant/smarter children, especially when they'll see other people getting those advantages.
"advanced" ? It's maybe not the best term... If "ethically advanced" means having ethics that allow to do human tests to built a stronger race then Hitler was very "ethically advanced"
They have no ethics whereas it is for privacy or human tests. Of course having no ethics is the easy way to get a technological advantage over others that have some. And it's going to drive all country to do the same (like how US and China surveillance drove other countries to do the same). It's sad to see the world going towards exactly the dystopia described in sci-fi : total surveillance, data about anyone's whole life, AI discriminating people in their everyday life based on those data, and soon some people stronger / more resistant / more handsome than other because their rich parents payed the prenium gene editing package (and how many failed-babies experiment to get there ?).
But people are happy about it because less terrorism and less diseases right ?
This is nothing extraordinary, there are many people having a math Bachelor or Master. Also a famous university name on your BA/MA tells nothing about your level. University get their ranking through research publications not through undergrad math test . So what really matters is whereas you choose to dedicate (a part of) your life to Math or not, there is no secret magical course at Cambridge that will enlight you, courses are pretty much the same in all big universities