Haters will always hate. Keep up the good work guys! People seem to think they are entitled to something when using open-source software, but they're not. It's still the people working and maintaining it who get to take the decisions, and if you guys think you need analytics to provide a better tool, go for it.
I also completely understand the need for default opt-in. I probably wouldn't check the prompt and leave the default, but for a project like this, I honestly don't mind sending usage data.
If you're not happy with the direction taken by the maintainers, find another tool.
The team behind Brew is doing a great job and if analytics can help them do a better job, then be it. Nobody is forcing you to use it and opting out is simple enough.
Yes, I know about this model but it wasn't made by Fielding and he made his positions pretty clear about what's RESTful and what's not.
I do agree that this model is a good set of steps to build better APIs but then, how do you call them? RESTful Level 1 API?
My point with this article is just to call API what they are (usually just HTTP APIs). I'm totally against the use of the REST buzzword these days since it doesn't mean much anymore: everyone has a different view on it.
The link you gave is pretty good. Note however, that in this article I wasn't trying to explain in details what is REST.
What I want is more to let people know why their APIs are not RESTful so they can use the kind of resources you gave to actually learn more about REST.
Yes, you can just use Rails as an API and create a frontend SPA. But in my opinion, it's faster to write in the 'old way' for a MVP instead of creating 2 different applications (one frontend, one backend). For the future, I'm actually thinking about rewriting the frontend using SPA technologies.
You're probably right indeed! I was just looking into refactoring some code, found that and thought it was pretty cool. Plus Rails comes with CoffeeScript by default.
ES6 is pretty sweet (pun intended) and will probably make CS kinda useless in the future. I'll look into it however I think that currently CoffeeScript is a bit of a standard in the Rails world.
Author here. I totally get you guys. I'm just the same and I actually got a few hate comments (not on HN) about this article. Of course, it makes me sad and I'm thinking about just stopping everything. Why bother? But the next day, I realize there are people who liked it and that makes me want to try again and get better :)
Author here, I'm sorry if the article felt that way, that wasn't my intention at all. It's true that it's something that works for me (and probably for other people) but people should obviously do what they want.
I still think everyone should give it a try. Maybe it won't work for them but it could be great for others. They won't know until they've tried ;)
I also completely understand the need for default opt-in. I probably wouldn't check the prompt and leave the default, but for a project like this, I honestly don't mind sending usage data.
If you're not happy with the direction taken by the maintainers, find another tool.