throwaeayBan

no profile record

comments

·11 anni fa·discuss

Please note that I am against extra prizes (because of private bits or skin colour) in open tournaments. Women can have their titles, their own tournaments, their own prizes ( in their tournaments) as long as men can have same. I just request everyone be treated same in tournament where everyone is alowed and fights free for all ( if tournament is split into two separate groups - prizes can be different too)

throwaeayBan

·11 anni fa·discuss

Mind providing examples of males having prize when outnumbered (preferably not once but consistently) or where men get headstart (like in marathon I can't remember name of, where women get head start)? Because I will be angry about that too. It kills competition, it kills meritocracy.

throwaeayBan

·11 anni fa·discuss

Thank you. Exactly what I was refering to (was linked in article).

throwaeayBan

·11 anni fa·discuss

"Top female Prize " and... no top male prize...We can never be equal while there is any discrimination even when it is possitive. And please don't start with "we need more women in chess thus...". No, we need good players in ches and not insert anything here. And tell, what forces us to improve more than competition? Why play better when you will get prize anyway?

throwaeayBan

·11 anni fa·discuss

Well, someone is lying. Either this artice or feminists who claim that back in day women were treated as chattel. Calling out propaganda aside - with all this feminism and men stayed in same place while women advanced their right far above what men have - men are still workhorses to provide, serv and sacrifice.