>I’ve settled into an uneasy position: AI for work where the productivity gain justifies the privacy cost, strict boundaries everywhere else. It’s not philosophically clean. It’s just honest.
That's a real bummer. Is there any way the author can prevent this? Can he generate random indexes that don't repeat while keeping this random number generator code public?
You think expressing dissent is akin to mental abuse? I think people have every right to express their opinions or dissaproval regardless of how many twitter followers they have.
>actively working to harm the lives of trans people.
That is some exaggeration, unless you have some video of Nina chasing trans people with a machete or similar. I would say she has some dissatisfaction about how transactivism is carried out nowadays and how gender-identity has become a religion.
Nice tool. I just found that if you have fields separated by arbitrary whitespaces, piping that through xargs trims multiple whitespaces into a single whitespace.
>I’ve settled into an uneasy position: AI for work where the productivity gain justifies the privacy cost, strict boundaries everywhere else. It’s not philosophically clean. It’s just honest.