This is a surprising view given that I'm T1D in the UK and the healthcare I've received, along with the tech, support and collaboration with diabetic consultants has been first class. You are making an assumption that every doctor is like the one you have (I guess), but its simply not the case.
Good luck with your programming, but the agenda you're pushing for it is remarkably short-sighted.
The scientific paper isn't designed for people who need explanation/visualisation of a logarithmic curve. People who read that paper should be able to quickly decipher what the authors have written – their writing is consistent with normal mathematical instruction.
The electrical drawing would be obvious to anyone who is used to working with them.
There are obvious places where this would work– dissemination of material is always useful in many different forms. But this is NOT an answer to a question that is being asked. Rather, it is an alternative form of dissemination to an alternative audience.
I agree. We should leave the responsibility of the upkeep of a virtual presence after death to the person themselves. Aaron showed that you can plan for your presence after death: maybe we should all have some sort of plan. (Something like a will).
Good luck with your programming, but the agenda you're pushing for it is remarkably short-sighted.