I can't believe so many people fight over a syntax. In a perfect world, you wouldn't even care about the syntax that others use because it would automatically be translated into the syntax of your preferences when you look at it.
I love that you are working on this. It's one problem that I really want fixed.
But, your description doesn't impress and convince me. I'd drop at least more than half of the document. I'd drop most of the description about the problems with current textbooks and all the vague sales pitches. I'd focus on why your solution is better.
As I am reading this, I got the impression that you don't have much except being free and online.
Where does the content come from? Are the authors a good reference? How do you plan on making money? With annoying ads?
And the lawsuit seems like a different document. Used for publicity?
Check on Google for "best philosophical movies" and it's always in the top 10.