in the real world, people have to draw on their wisdom, intuition and guts, intelligence and common sense in order to make immediate partially speculative conclusions/decisions. there’s no luxury of engaging in pointless pedantic philosophizing that the ivory tower can afford.
state sponsored cyber attack is less of a new variable than coincidence could ever be. 3 major us computer systems down on the same day chinas market crashed, not related at all, all just a coincidence, really? were the WTC attacks and pentagon attacks on 9/11 also two different "coincidences" or part of one same group of attacks?
this site is a prime example why even average iq 100 people can outthink iq 140 engineer types at some tasks by a multiple factor using intuition and common sense since the smarter people rely overly on the slower left brain analysis that can't take many variables into account quickly, making them come up with some astoundingly morbid conclusions.
If there's smoke there's fire. In my view, Occam's razor might indicate that coincidence is unlikely, and that the two major incidents in US on the same day China's market crash suggest it's a state sponsored cyber attack.
Scientists know very little about QM despite it being known for 80 years due to political, resource and human IQ restraints. The human knowledge in this area is not even in infancy yet.
The experiments on Quantum Entanglement have only begun to intensify in recent years. With the advent of AI and commercial interest in the field due to communication opportunities, this may change rapidly.
When you say FTL communication is impossible that is a mere speculation at best, and a remarkably short sighted and laughable one in retrospect to paradigm shifts in the history of human technology. Scientific conservatism like that is a silly and shameful attempt to signal high status, which has held back human progress many times in the past. FTL communication is a major necessity and this field needs to be explored and pushed into hard without being held back by naysayers with dubious motives.
It's only 2015, I think it's a little ridiculous to make far sweeping conclusions about whole realms of science supposedly not working based on limited current understanding of science.
This guy seems to believe otherwise and many other scientific breakthroughs were declared as impossible before they were done, it is unwise to cling to limiting beliefs like that as that kind of attitude prevents technological advancement.
In fact, it can be speculated that messages could be sent in the future as well as in the past, and other parallel universes as well.
state sponsored cyber attack is less of a new variable than coincidence could ever be. 3 major us computer systems down on the same day chinas market crashed, not related at all, all just a coincidence, really? were the WTC attacks and pentagon attacks on 9/11 also two different "coincidences" or part of one same group of attacks?
this site is a prime example why even average iq 100 people can outthink iq 140 engineer types at some tasks by a multiple factor using intuition and common sense since the smarter people rely overly on the slower left brain analysis that can't take many variables into account quickly, making them come up with some astoundingly morbid conclusions.