I honestly can’t tell whether this comment is satire or this site is just full of people who have no ability (or no interest) in understanding other people. You don’t need to be a psychologist or even have a good understanding of other people to recognize what a ridiculous suggestion this is. You just have to care a tiny little bit about other people. Is that really too much to expect?
Though given that the psychopath alleged-incestuous-rapist Sam Altman has been the top user on the site since literally day one I suppose I shouldn’t be surprised
Their entire business is around the facilitation of illegal gambling, large scale fraud, tax evasion, money laundering, terrorist financing, and drug trafficking, with a tiny percentage of semi-legitimate users. Their founders have consistently behave like narcissist, who are always the victim in every situation and believe the rules shouldn’t apply to them.
It would be shocking if they weren’t always disgracing themselves
He is not the author. The author’s post would still say I’ve never tested this and leave people uncertain about whether it’s actually a viable design.
I feel like as a matter of policy or at least convention, people really shouldn’t be uploading models that they haven’t at least printed. It’s disrespectful.
That’s clever! Disappointing response from Django if that means they’re not going to fix it… I could understand it being outside the scope of their official vulnerability classification/process/whatever, but it’s still a clear correctness bug.
It’s entirely possible. Claude’s security model for subagents/tasks is incoherent and buggy, far below the standard they set elsewhere in their product, and planning mode can use subagent/tasks for research.
Permission limitations on the root agent have, in many cases, not been propagated to child agents, and they’ve been able to execute different commands. The documentation is incomplete and unclear, and even to the extent that it is clear it has a different syntax with different limitations than are used to configure permissions for the root agent. When you ask Claude itself to generate agent configurations, as is recommended, it will generate permissions that do not exist anywhere in the documentation and may or may not be valid, but there’s no error admitted if an invalid permission is set. If you ask it to explain, it gets confused by their own documentation and tells you it doesn’t know why it did that. I’m not sure if it’s hallucinating or if the agent-generating-agent has access to internal detail details that are not documented anywhere in which the normal agent can’t see.
Anthropic is pretty consistently the best in this space in terms of security and product quality. They seem to actually care about doing software engineering properly. (I’ve personally discovered security bugs in several competing products that are more severe and exploitable than what I’m talking about here.) I have a ton of respect for Anthropic. Unfortunately, when it comes to sub agents in Claude code, they are not living up to standard they have set.
Well, this has affected my friendships with Americans. Most of them I’m still friends with, but being politically ambivalent or worse, supporting the president, is no longer acceptable. I tried to be open minded and have friends from different political backgrounds, but at this point if you are not explicitly on our side, you are an enemy and I am no longer talking talking to you. You either oppose the American government or you are evil. There is no alternative remaining at this point, and I’m not friends with evil people.
Though given that the psychopath alleged-incestuous-rapist Sam Altman has been the top user on the site since literally day one I suppose I shouldn’t be surprised