Do I understand this correctly in that if the list goes on, it will also show posts with unrelated tags in tag_names? As the filter is only applied to match_count?
So to only get blog posts with matching tags we would need to add a filter „match_count > 0“, right?
I‘ve been fascinated by this film for years now and highly recommend it for anyone who likes artistic and a bit surreal sci-fi films. It‘s one of the few films that somehow deeply touches me, where I can fully immerse.
Errr... reading your points I presume you've never really done that (notifying a service provider).
> Why don't you contact police or the site owner instead?
Police? Seriously? My police here in germany or the italian police? What do you think will happen? Right: nothing.
Site owner? If you can tell me the site owner from an IP... I will do that.
> You risk prosecution.
By telling a service provider that they host malicious content and should do sth. about it? Now that's an interesting view.
> If it's a brazen criminal using their own host [...] No customer support required.
The customer support was the only way to contact the provider. It doesn't matter if they are housing or hosting malicious content. They are at least partly responsible, especially if someone is telling them.
And the problem is that Facebook has dozens of scores about our personality which allow them to individually steer and control people.
What you share is not what all your "friends" see. They see what Facebook decides to show. Plus what else Facebook decides is helping to keep your friends happy with the platform.
Facebook is not like Wikipedia, a platform for all to freely and transparently share, no it's only purpose is to bind us to the platform and get willing ad targets.
I couldn't agree more - one search engine is a terrible thing. But for other reasons.
It's amazing to see how in other areas people complain about monopolies but when it comes to our window to the digital world, most of us seem to be fine with it.
One US monopoly that dictates what should be important for us, filters what we see based on secret algorithms, forces us to "optimize" our websites in this and that way along their "standards".
Google has good technology but we should wake up and see they are not the altruists they like to tell everyone.
> You can't just start collecting data about servers as they get installed and about services and resources as they emerge and disappear.
You can do that in Zabbix, it has two functions to discover hosts (called "network discovery") or "features" like running services or e.g. switch ports (called "low level discovery") and apply templates based on certain query results (open ports, SNMP values etc.).
Alerting the lack of new incoming data is also possible.
I used Zabbix a lot until a year ago and liked it much more than Nagios+descendants.