Is that 300B Apple's global revenue? If so, I'd imagine there's your answer. Prior Apple fancy accounting tricks had all revenue funneled through the friendliest tax haven until they got called on it.
I'd imagine though, only US revenue gets claimed in CA.
I'm also perplexed about this. Anyone's car could be stolen, and then used to commit any number of crimes. Maybe the woman in the article didn't report the car as stolen?
Sorry, I should have specifically mentioned how it differs from random indexing/projection. I was immediately reminded of a similar inference example using random indexing/projection.
I'd imagine though, only US revenue gets claimed in CA.