Ads do really seem increasingly likely to transport some political/ideological content. Is this happening the customer's explicit request, or are agencies and/or their individual creatives surreptiously hitching a political/ideological ride at their customer's risk and expense?
Maybe Civil Society's empathy was exploited a bit too much, a bit too brazenly. If that's the reason, insisting the show must go on won't get you much empathy.
> That's it. You're welcome. Many compilers just do those, get ~80% best-case perf.
You could be excused if you came away from this believing that Frances Allen invented all of these optimizations.
She didn't.
With that cleared up, you might think that, at least, she is the sole author of the overview paper cited.
She isn't.
It seems an overwhelming need to come up with some heroic narrative around "women in coding" got the better of this author. I don't think this kind of "proof" is helpful.
The point of being GPL free is you don't need to release source code.
If you combine this with the other point of Fuchsia, hardcore security, the final combined result is that nobody can audit what Google is actually doing on "your" devices. And that's why.
Which is why I strongly suspect ad agency creatives did this on their own. Being in Brazil may have made them feel free from client scrutiny.