I know most posters on here are mainly talking about the existence of ghost jobs (which I think exist), but estimating that 21% of job postings are ghost jobs based on a dataset categorized by asking ChatGPT-4o seems, idk, iffy?
No -- looking at the code [here](https://github.com/keijiro/AICommand/blob/main/Assets/Editor...), it's sending the input with a wrapper to ChatGPT and running whatever the API sends back. I guess that "action, thing, amount" tasks are probably the least likely for ChatGPT to hallucinate on.
It seems like what op is trying to say is that being a data scientist is a cross disciplinary position, so you can't really start off as a data scientist, rather you become one through other positions. However, their complaints feel more like either an inability or unwillingness to make the team a place for its members to grow. Ideally, members would be doing code review, so issues with ugly/inefficient code can be addressed and learned from. Getting up to speed on the organization's systems, which system to use situationally, general philosophical thinking behind what the data is, which problems to solve and how to solve them are definitely things that come out when a mid-level mentors a junior, which should be a thing that happens on the team, because it not only helps the juniors get up to speed, but it reinforces the mid-level member's knowledge. I think that speaks to real structural issues in how the team is set up, and if op's the head of a data team, I wouldn't want to work for him or for a company he works at in that capacity.
> You know how often Breitbart links appear in Facebook or Google News? Never.
Both Google News and Facebook tailor what you see based on your search history/engagement habits. Just because you've never seen Breitbart in your search results doesn't mean no one's seen it.
>For too long, we’ve been held back by burdensome regulations on our energy industry. President Trump is committed to eliminating harmful and unnecessary policies such as the Climate Action Plan and the Waters of the U.S. rule.
Medium's not supposed to overtake WordPress. Arguably, Blogger wasn't supposed to overtake WordPress. Wordpress is a CMS, and you can hammer any organization of content, from stores to news sites into it. Medium and blogger are blogging platforms -- they're specifically made to display text and images in an attractive manner.
No, they had a court order to take down the post, including the excerpt of the video that they posted, and they only took down the video (and, on appeal, was found to be in the right).
I don't think it's intellectually honest to mix and match stats from different studies to fit your worldview. The study that has the 1 in 21 stat for men who have been forced to penetrate also says that 1 in 5 women have been raped.
>Around one in 20 of women and men equally, have been forced into sexual intercourse against their will, in their lifetime. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_by_gender.
>While it's nobody's fault, it makes English poorer. There are already lots of general-purpose intensifiers. English doesn't particularly need another one.
I'm more than a little bothered by this line of reasoning. Spoken languages aren't like programming languages, where having many ways to express the same thing can be seen as a detriment. Having more ways for one to express oneself can only make the language richer.