There is little evidence in that piece, only the mention of a couple of people "familiar with the matter".
Strangely what I find most troubling with that article is the idiotic dig about opensource, it's like dismissing peer-review, which makes me even more skeptical about this whole article.
Strangely what I find most troubling with that article is the idiotic dig about opensource, it's like dismissing peer-review, which makes me even more skeptical about this whole article.