Aaron was offered two plea deals, one that carried 4 months and another with 6 months but a chance to plead with the judge for a lesser, perhaps entirely noncustodial sentence.
It’s a particularly poor example of government cruelty.
Lawbreaking is almost never prosecuted, so you’ll have to explicitly explain the reasoning behind your question.
Far less than 1% of all crime which happens is prosecuted, why should OpenAI be prosecuted?
Since the necessary context isn’t provided, this just seems like an utterly stupid question. The obvious answer is “OpenAI probably isn’t being prosecuted because crimes are almost never prosecuted”.
It’s like asking why I don’t get arrested every time I get stopped shitfaced drunk at the La Turbie police checkpoint. The answer is obvious: The cops are looking for brown people, there are no taxis here and after 2am everyone driving in the vicinity of Monaco will be drunk. i.e. nobody gives a shit
This is a deeply uninteresting example for anyone clueful. It’s an authenticated RCE in redis, anyone even vaguely familiar with the codebase knows to not expect there to be any real security boundary in place here.
Don’t confuse this with an unauthenticated RCE, that would actually matter. Absolutely anyone can shit out endless bugs like this with AFL, this is an extremely messy unhardened surface that expects trusted inputs.
>Amazingly, they managed to _undersell_ the ill effects that the oil industry would have on even just the US, such as the oil-driven military actions we've taken over the years.
This is such a deeply clownish take. What about all of the military actions that never took place in the world because of global economic co-operation and integration driven by the oil industry?
Why do those not count?
Why the need for dishonesty? There are endless perfectly credible criticisms of the oil industry to be delivered.
They did send lawyers to my door in the end though.
Someone had forgot IPv6 rate limit bucketing :)