I don't know what she is entitled to from (apparently) co-founding the company. But apart from that, usually people don't earn Billions of Dollars just for raising kids.
Yes, technically the money already belongs to her (I guess, depending on the exact laws). The question is, has she earned it.
I personally don't care, but I think it is a bit rich to complain about such headlines.
They made headline last year because they became visible again.
I don't want to dispute that shrinking glaciers and global warming might be an issue. But one dry summer doesn't prove it. There was no global warming in the 15th century.
It seems likely there are at least some insects that can adapt to the slightly higher temperatures in the rain forest. If now their predators (birds) have gone down, these insects can multiply, becoming a food source for birds, whose population can then recover.
I love insects like the next guy, but we need to stop believing everything besides completely static environments are a catastrophe.
What does "society values" mean, though? These women in their 70ies supposedly don't care about being attractive. So the only thing that matters is could they get decent jobs if they were unattractive. They supposedly don't care about societies evaluation of their attractiveness anyway.
And we were talking about "pressure to be attractive". What form does that take. What happens to you if you are unattractive?
"Most of us don’t miss the male gaze. It came with catcalls, harassment and unwanted attention. Instead, we feel free from the tyranny of worrying about our looks. For the first time since we were 10, we can feel relaxed about our appearance."
I call bullshit. People spend Billions to become more attractive, and rarely anything to become less attractive.
If these women would have suffered so much from the "male gaze", they could have taken steps to look as unattractive as possible way earlier than in their 70ies.
Not sure if the complaint here is simply from developers of badly designed apps?
I didn't do much Android development, but last year I had to develop a small app doing a continuous background task.
Yes, it is hard to do that in Android (it seems). But you are supposed to use all sorts of other mechanisms that Android provides. Like for an alarm clock, I guess you tell some system service to play the sound and then go back to sleep. The sound keeps playing and your app sleeps (I guess - don't know this particular case).
Some things seemed really hard to do, but it is by design, and users really need to be protected from vampiric apps.
At what point in the history of Amazon would he have earned enough to afford a good nanny? I think the argument falls apart at that point in time.