But just to verify: Asserting a bad state of affairs and pointing out possible sources of error (ie ideology) does not merit a comment? Do I always need to somehow provide a solution? This seems reductionist to me.
A way of life, a way of thinking is not an engineering problem. Trying to find a common language to tackle difficult societal problems is the first step in my view. That’s why I keep throwing in my point of view even though HN does really not like thinking about ideology inherent to disruptive™️ entrepreneurship™️ economics of 2018.
But just to verify: Asserting a bad state of affairs and pointing out possible sources of error (ie ideology) does not merit a comment? Do I always need to somehow provide a solution? This seems reductionist to me.
A way of life, a way of thinking is not an engineering problem. Trying to find a common language to tackle difficult societal problems is the first step in my view. That’s why I keep throwing in my point of view even though HN does really not like thinking about ideology inherent to disruptive™️ entrepreneurship™️ economics of 2018.