Your LLM-assisted scientific breakthrough probably isn't real
lesswrong.com5 pointsby eggsyntax2 comments
This is a proper list:
(a b c)
and this is not:
(a b . c)
Could someone clarify how to interpret '(a b . c)'? How would it be represented in the non-abbreviated dot notation for pairs? It's not '(a . (b . (c . nil))' -- is it '((a . b) . c)'? The only Lisp I'm fluent in is Clojure, so I'm not used to the dot notation; otherwise this might be obvious.