Disclaimer: This work is done by some of my colleagues.
As someone pointed out, there are 25 pages of text (not including bibliography of course), not 5.
Most publications are coming with multiple months delay before code release (if any), here you literally have a written soft deadline of 1 week. So maybe you can wait few days before posting such bad comment?
> I'm also not going to pay a subscription fee to every site I come across that might have a decently written article once in a while.
What if the site was consistenly putting decent articles? I think one of the argument is that you would see more of those decent articles if people were more enclined to follow a subscription model where the journal is accountable to its customers.
My experience seems to resonate with a good amount of ppl here. I graduated from a very average university and my grades were a roller-coaster, I tend to prefer learning in depth topics that I'm interested into rather than study for exam and that led me to difficult times. I went to a more prestigious university for exchange and to my surprise students were not better in in-depth understanding but even more exam-smart...
One thing I've ended thinking is that University is just not good for learning in-depth (at least my field of computer engineering) I'm way better at that on my own, what it was good at tho is helping me building a map of knowledge of concepts I was not aware of, I'm thankful I discovered ML in a class which then became my passion and career.
Or just to do what he did. Ian Goodfellow and probably all his team will have no problem finding another job in the condition they want. Apple don't have any monopole on AI jobs.
This is so vague... Me breathing air has real consequences. You probably mean "societal" consequences, and it's also way too vague, moderating has real consequences as much as not moderating.
Isn't there a psychological phenomenon (I can't remember the name) where despite that you can find some news article that are complete BS, and you know it because it's an area in which you are knowledgeable, but you still believe the other articles in which you have no knowledge?
While such comments appear to be troll-ish I think it's always good to have a reminder.
Despite downvotes this comment is very true. A modern constitution (the foundation of a country) is all about citizen rights to counter power, if you think government should just be trusted without actions to require more safeguard and transparency then you are pretty much waving your rights, and you probably don't deserve them.
To whomever is saying that "only position of the light matter" I invite you to try playing a car simulation game where all the arrows are inverted.
Arrows are so well used (especially in the driving context) that the way we react to them is down to subconscious reflex. Imagine that the light is replaced by and neon written ("RIGHT" on the left side, and "LEFT" on the right side)
and is there any advices in this book to avoid focusing on the technique in important moment? I used to play foosball competitively and this used to eat me when I started to doubt about my technique.
I think it's more about anonymous down voting to be very enticing for people who "hate" certain ideologies. Which can go either side, regulation, unionization, I've seen both side comments been downvoted. But on both case, yup, to hell with the nuance.