> Unless physically striking someone, it is not possible to hurt someone's feelings. Feelings are important, no doubt, but feelings are entirely the responsibility of the feeler.
I get where you’re coming from, and in most cases there is a large amount of truth to this. But your statement, as absolutely as you have expressed it, is a bold claim and needs more backing up.
If people could simply choose to be free of sadness, depression, or anxiety, we would - we’d all just decide to be happy all the time. We have more agency over our feelings than we think, but still only some.
Perhaps you were making your statement with people of privilege in mind. People of privilege walk around with fewer open wounds, retain an accordingly larger capacity for resilience, and are much more able to take your advice to heart. However, it is also good of them to be mindful of their conduct for the sake of those who aren’t in that position.
I love Muse, and 2.0 is a huge gain for me.
I only wish that the inking/writing/drawing experience was a bit better.
When I use a real pen to write notes on real paper, my handwriting is pretty! That generates positive feelings for me both when I create notes, and also when I review notes.
In the same way, the apps in which my handwriting looks good create a feedback loop where seeing my own handwriting encourages me to continue to write more, and makes the app more "sticky" for me.
At the moment, my handwriting in Muse looks displeasing, which discourages me from writing more. I'm currently getting around this by mostly using the new text note type instead of ink, but it is a more limited kind of expression and note taking than free-form inking, which is a shame.
I understand this behaviour/reaction is unlikely to be universal, or might be a condemning expression of vanity on my part in some way, but still - I might not be alone!
> You might say I "deserve" my current place in life. Nothing has been handed to me, and I'm unusually smart and hard working. But I believe that I was born smart, and I've always had a compulsion to work hard.
> I feel uncomfortable interacting with people of lower social classes.
I think these are the parts that one might read less as "a sign of empathy and humility", and skew more towards "superiority".
People who are known for their aptitude for empathy and humility are more likely to see people as individuals (rather than placing them into bins such as "people of lower social class"), and less likely to assume that their personal life experience is comprehensive enough to make definitive-sounding statements on pretty subjective matters (such as classifying themselves as "unusually smart", where "smart" is a contentious thing to quantify at the best of times, or saying "nothing has been handed to me", when it's rather likely they're the beneficiary of at least some amount of privilege). I think this is what codingdave is referring to.
If we're talking about the same posts - would we call them clones?
They seem like different games, with different rules. They may be inspired by the original game in some way, but they seem like creative offerings of their own merit, and it's interesting to see the ways different people's minds go with it.
I think I'd personally call a clone a "re-implementation of the same concept".
Without weighing in on the rest, I'd quickly note that the name of the post seems mostly to be a reference to an (unrelated) visual novel called "Analogue: A Hate Story".
On the flip side, anecdotally, all the engineers I know carry at least some level of anti-billionaire sentiment, and in my observable circles the defenders of ultra-richness are typically those whose understanding of the world doesn't stand up to scrutiny, and are also those who aren't involved in building, creating, or adding value to the world. To some extent, we are all victims of our own bubbles.
That seems somewhat overly general and pessimistic. Some of us develop strong support relationships with our colleagues on our teams, which results in conversations and activities that happen well outside of work hours or premises, and lasting friendships that remain strong even years after they've parted ways with the company that brought us together.
I enjoyed the trial of the service, but couldn't bring myself to subscribe. It's irrational, but knowing that I just wasn't in the "right place at the right time" to get a widely-available good deal on a lifetime plan makes me have negative emotions towards signing up for a subscription.
Have you tried Scratch (https://scratch.mit.edu/)? It sounds similar to what you're describing. If you have any ideas on a better way to do this, maybe you should build it - there's a lot of interest in "accessible programming".
I find it difficult to answer the question without some idea of what the "better experience" might be. Tabs are the best idea anyone's offered me so far, and I have no better idea off the top of my head, so I'm happy to use them. Show me an alternative implementation that I love, and I'll happily abandon tabs. Conversely, show me an alternative implementation that doesn't address my needs as well, and I will stick to tabs.
While I do agree with your sentiment that some are being too quick to dismiss the idea without trying it, I'd like to add that this feature (or one very much like it) has actually been available in Labs for a while, so it's possible that some commenters may have real feedback on it already.
If you're saying what I think you're saying, I think you've misunderstood: if this feature is like their current Labs offering, the "Promotions" label is applied to your incoming mail that is best classified as a "Promotion", such as any promotional email from sites you shop at - it's not additional content that Gmail is feeding you. If you don't have any such email, I suspect this category would simply be empty for you.
I get where you’re coming from, and in most cases there is a large amount of truth to this. But your statement, as absolutely as you have expressed it, is a bold claim and needs more backing up.
If people could simply choose to be free of sadness, depression, or anxiety, we would - we’d all just decide to be happy all the time. We have more agency over our feelings than we think, but still only some.
Perhaps you were making your statement with people of privilege in mind. People of privilege walk around with fewer open wounds, retain an accordingly larger capacity for resilience, and are much more able to take your advice to heart. However, it is also good of them to be mindful of their conduct for the sake of those who aren’t in that position.