My bet (I don't think there is any confirmation of it) is that the AMD board is still the one released last year. The main difference I see is that the new Intel board uses LPCAMM2 memory whereas the AMD board relies on usual socketed memory that has higher latency and is more memory hungry.
I guess it's mostly because cpython has a fairly good C API allowing PyO3 to just write "safe" wrappers on top of cpython APIs and provide macros to generate boilerplate whereas wasm-bindgen has to generate both Rust and JS sides and deal with the painful linear memory intermediate.
Igalia is a quite specific "consulting" agency that employs developers and get contracts from client to implement specific features or fix specific bugs, usually around FOSS. They have people who knows how to contribute to Firefox, Chrome, WebKit, Linux, Mesa... It's the go to company if you want to get something done in these projects when not having the resources for that in house.
For example they work for Valve to make the Radeon drivers better and got a grant to get basic MathML support done in the three major web browsers.
UV for packaging and dependency management, Ruff for linting, Mypy for type checking (will be likely replaced by Ty when ready) and whatever editor people like (PyCharm, VSCode, Helix...)
A lot of large castle owners in France have setup a small apartment on the side for winter and use the main rooms only occasionally and during summer. This is not something new, in Versailles you can visit the king actual private bedroom that is much smaller and easy to heat than the official one.
If I understand correctly, this library provides some Torch kernels customized for AMD hardware. Why haven't they just upstreamed them to PyTorch for better adoption? Also, they seem to demo usage with Torch default eager execution mode and not Torch JIT/TorchScript. Is this library compatible with TorchScript?
But before becoming priest there is a quite long training program (often 5-6 years). Dropping out of it is quite common.
And even after becoming a priest, they can asked to be relieved for their obligations, including celibacy. But in this case they would have to find an other job.
Rail lines are massively subsidized and the French government is regularly bailing out SNCF (the national rail company). So imho it not clear that the global market distortion is in the favor of plane.
> the customer can run, patch, and run as patched, but not share with others.
> the seller guarantees the software will work as documented, won’t be infected with malware, won’t be riddled with security holes, won’t contain plagiarized code.
The two points together are dangerous: they make the seller commit that the software works as intended, even if it is patched by the customer.
The second point is also terrible for the seller: it creates an unbounded liability in case of bug or security issues. Let's assumme that a security vulnerability is discovered, the seller is liable for its exploitation even if they released a patched version that the customer has not applied.
I am currently building a single-node graph database implementing the SPARQL query language. It is written in Rust and is named Oxigraph: https://github.com/oxigraph/oxigraph
I would love to get help, I have a working MVP but there are a lot of work left to get good performances for which I would love help. Some current problems are:
- Very big write amplification (the database size on disk is very large).
- The query optimizer is basically non existent.
- The query evaluation code might be easily optimized further.
The neural engine seems to be only about inference. For training it seems most systems rely on Metal like the Apple Tensorflow plugin [1]. But I have never tried to do ML on macs so I am maybe wrong.
I like sled that is a nice embedded key value store written in Rust: https://sled.rs/
However, it is still in heavy development and a bit of a moving target even if the developers are currently heading toward stabilization of the file format.