Are these numbers for real, and are these all Bay Area? I'm further North and pull no where near these numbers as an ML PhD with a lot of experience now in the tech industry. Have I goofed on all negotiations?
I didn't look too hard but didn't see any similar free services with full DNS management and an API for cache validation. Would love a suggestion here too!
Seeing a link to the dailymail is a hint that HN may be jumping the shark. This is a UK rag of a paper.
Clearly this driver is outside of the recommended highway driving scenario. There are multiple warnings both audible and big red indications on the sensor dash that automation is about to stop.
Would we have a problem if I set cruise control in my Mazda to 60MPH then drove off a tight bend? No, we would call this driver error.
You can really appreciate the difference between the gentle movement induced with mechanically actuated magnets, and the nasty instantaneous movement which would happen with electro.
Please show a paper where fine-grained vehicle classification in unconstrained images is anywhere near this performance from 20 years ago. You will not be able to, because it wasn't.
I don't see anything new here, but for any practioners like myself Scikit-learn and Spyder were the Python tools which finally moved me from a die hard MATLAB junkie.
Within about two weeks, and with a little bit of discipline, I became a MATLAB->Python convert. Spyder is a solid IDE, and Anaconda comes with all the packages you need (i.e. Matplotlib...).
All that's left now is to find a solution to MATLAB's excellent debugging. You can break to pydb in Spyder but the debug environment is nowhere near as functional as iPython.
So I had always heard this is the case, and now believe this must be a common misconception. See Table 6 in this file from the Office of National Statistics:
While from 2004 to 2012 total UK fertility increased from 1.80 to 1.98, the fertility rate for non-UK born women actually /decreased/ from 2.50 to 2.29 (albeit in a slightly messy non-monotonic fashion) while the fertility rate for UK born mothers /increased/ from 1.69 to 1.90 quite monotonically.
It would be interesting to see the stats including 2nd and 3rd generation immigrant mothers (i.e. born in UK both with parents born elsewhere).
Were they playing anything or just walking around in the demo? I have one and have tested it out with many people. When people get sick it's usually because they've been in one of the less interactive demos just sort of looking around wiggling the mouse etc. The people who I let loose straight onto Half-Life 2 or other games where there is some sort of goal rarely get the same type of nausea. I think this is worth taking into account when people say "it's nausea inducing".
For insta-nausea put someone in the Tuscany demo and move them around while they wear the rift. Hilarity ensues!
Which attributes would you sample from a normal distribution here? I don't see any numerical attributes where this would make sense. One could add weight, height, age etc. and sample from the relevant geographical/gender distributions?
Wasn't obvious to me on a first skim through either, but on second viewing all simple variable names are single letters - exactly as one would get through minifying. See for example here and below:
https://gist.github.com/anonymous/5133829#file-simcityui-js-...
In a mission to gather data then clearly extra megapixels give you extra data. You cannot argue against that! We aren't talking amateur photography here where the quality of the shot is important and a decent lens beats higher megapixels, we are talking acquiring measurements of the amount of photons in a discrete spatial region. Clearly a higher resolution of sensor might allow scientists to see something not visible in lower resolution images. Although I do admit that in this case I understand the choice due to specification and testing, but to suggest that extra megapixels do not give more information is silly.