> but it always seems worth noting when someone completely anonymous writes something like this [...] since nobody knows who this guy is, nobody knows his motivations either.
I'm the author and your point is 100% valid. Not that you needed me to validate it.
> Does this person have some sort of credibility other than the four posts on this blog?
Sure do.
The intent here wasn't to bash Krebs so much as bash Krebs using the same perpetual source of a company that he is a consultant for. Krebs is an OK guy -- I'd just like to see him utilize a variety of sources versus a reference loop between him and the groups he advises for.
I'm the author and your point is 100% valid. Not that you needed me to validate it.