A few months ago I looked into how to do an angled gradient in SVG and was baffled that is isn't supported. Now looking at this spec, it's also not in there. Why the hell is this something nobody talks about. Photoshop has it since ages...
It's still taking time I think. We understood that L1 should never have been the place for the end consumers and that's why all the chains (Bitcoin-Lightning; ETH various systems like StarkNet, zkSync, Loopring and so on) are currently in the process of finding out how to make everything that is happening on L1 possible on L2. On Ethereum one big part left out is still the the general ability to run EVM code on L2, but that is happening like right now.
Biggest problem after that will be user experience, but I am currently in the Ledger Connect (now Ledger extension) Testflight beta and it makes using dApps on iOS with a hardware wallet a really good experience. No cables, no app switching, no weird abstraction barrier. The new Stax also seems like a well thought out wallet that was created with a focus on UX. Only thing I don't yet see is a good NFC integration for existing payment terminals.
I still think the industry is really early. Layer 3 is now a topic for privacy preserving user interactions which is super interesting. It doesn't then stop at being your own bank, but with it you will be able to really control your own identity without anyone standing in the way. For needing less trust sharing your data and being self sovereign. Using the chains just as a highly accessible, authorized data store.
Yes I understand this, but with great power comes great responsibility. They should know this & not abuse it. Somebody that tries to educate the general public should not just shout, but take part in a dialogue.
I always loved the CCC and what its members are doing, but the "new" face (including Fluepke, Lilith) make them look inexperienced, naive, loud without being constructive and everything feels a bit unscientific. Also they don't really respond to any critique and just say they don't want to talk about the stuff they're criticizing.
But that’s the thing. Tesla wasn’t able to tell when the radar was “uncertain”. So when do you trust one data source more than the other? If it was so easy to label misinformation as such, the misinformation would probably not have been communicated in the first place. Tesla explained this at AI day 1.
I think the same. It's so typical everyone here tries to pin characteristics to exact professional groups. The amount of anecdotal evidence here is too damn high.
> I haven't tried the full self driving beta since I wasn't about to give Tesla ten grand so the car can change its own lanes, but I can't imagine it's any better.
So you admit you know nothing about the FSD beta (you think you will enter it by buying FSD) and then say you can't imagine it's any better? Please look for yourself. It's all over YouTube and comparing Autopilot to the FSD Beta is like comparing apples to oranges.
No that's not correct. These are people that didn't buy FSD, still have the old hardware and now decide to subscribe to FSD monthly. The chip costs are factored in when buying the 10k package. But now in Tesla's worst case, someone subscribes, gets the chip for free and then instantly cancels. An easy solution for Tesla should be a "upgrade your hardware and get x months for free situation" for a higher price or a contract for a specific number of months that you sign up for after the upgrade.